Rebekah Sheldon

443 total citations
14 papers, 107 citations indexed

About

Rebekah Sheldon is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Philosophy and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Rebekah Sheldon has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 107 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Cultural Studies, 3 papers in Philosophy and 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Rebekah Sheldon's work include Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (3 papers), Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (3 papers) and Geographies of human-animal interactions (2 papers). Rebekah Sheldon is often cited by papers focused on Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (3 papers), Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (3 papers) and Geographies of human-animal interactions (2 papers). Rebekah Sheldon collaborates with scholars based in United States. Rebekah Sheldon's co-authors include Julian Gill-Peterson, Kathryn Bond Stockton, Carl Freedman, Tom Moylan, Dan Hassler‐Forest, Catherine Constable, Phillip E. Wegner, Lisa Garforth, Alexis Lothian and Sherryl Vint and has published in prestigious journals such as GLQ A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, Angelaki and Science Fiction Studies.

In The Last Decade

Rebekah Sheldon

9 papers receiving 73 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Rebekah Sheldon United States	5	49	34	27	22	13	14	107
Daniel Heath Justice Canada	5	70 1.4×	36 1.1×	25 0.9×	17 0.8×	8 0.6×	18	166
Antonio Gómez-Moriana Canada	2	62 1.3×	20 0.6×	33 1.2×	11 0.5×	11 0.8×	10	105
Omise’eke Natasha Tinsley United States	5	94 1.9×	28 0.8×	75 2.8×	9 0.4×	8 0.6×	11	160
Robert F. Reid-Pharr United States	7	75 1.5×	49 1.4×	37 1.4×	4 0.2×	10 0.8×	20	146
John Lindow United States	9	27 0.6×	66 1.9×	16 0.6×	14 0.6×	20 1.5×	35	259
Jayna Brown United States	6	42 0.9×	13 0.4×	26 1.0×	6 0.3×	7 0.5×	15	98
Claudia Benthien Germany	4	22 0.4×	25 0.7×	16 0.6×	11 0.5×	14 1.1×	23	123
Rose M. Kim United States	1	54 1.1×	13 0.4×	24 0.9×	8 0.4×	7 0.5×	2	93
Maggie Ann Bowers United Kingdom	3	26 0.5×	93 2.7×	36 1.3×	7 0.3×	9 0.7×	12	121
José F. Colmeiro New Zealand	7	38 0.8×	70 2.1×	27 1.0×	27 1.2×	69 5.3×	45	160

Countries citing papers authored by Rebekah Sheldon

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rebekah Sheldon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebekah Sheldon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebekah Sheldon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rebekah Sheldon

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebekah Sheldon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebekah Sheldon. The network helps show where Rebekah Sheldon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rebekah Sheldon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rebekah Sheldon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rebekah Sheldon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rebekah Sheldon. Rebekah Sheldon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

14 of 14 papers shown

1.

Sheldon, Rebekah. (2023). Generativity without reserve. Science Fiction Film & Television. 16(3). 277–299.

2.

Sheldon, Rebekah. (2020). Storming the Reality Studio. American book review/The American book review. 41(3). 4–5.

3.

Sheldon, Rebekah. (2019). ACCELERATIONISM’S QUEER OCCULTURE. Angelaki. 24(1). 118–129.

4.

Wald, Priscilla, et al.. (2018). Orphan Black as protest. Science Fiction Film & Television. 11(3). 359–415. 1 indexed citations

5.

Sheldon, Rebekah. (2018). Trans-Embodiment and the Biopolitics of Reproduction in Orphan Black. Science Fiction Film & Television. 11(3). 385–390. 1 indexed citations

6.

Sheldon, Rebekah. (2017). Life. University of Minnesota Press eBooks.

7.

Baccolini, Raffaella, Catherine Constable, Carl Freedman, et al.. (2016). Utopia anniversary symposium. Science Fiction Film & Television. 9(1). 73–124. 1 indexed citations

8.

Sheldon, Rebekah. (2016). Dark Correlationism: Mysticism, Magic, and the New Realisms. symplokē. 24(1-2). 137–137. 2 indexed citations

9.

Sheldon, Rebekah. (2016). Matter and Meaning. 1–1. 4 indexed citations

10.

Sheldon, Rebekah. (2016). The Child to Come: Life after the Human Catastrophe. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University). 25 indexed citations

11.

Sheldon, Rebekah. (2016). Spectrum Orders: Digital Science Fiction and the Corrected Present. Science Fiction Studies. 43(1). 33–33. 1 indexed citations

12.

Sheldon, Rebekah. (2016). The Child to Come. University of Minnesota Press eBooks. 50 indexed citations

13.

Gill-Peterson, Julian, Rebekah Sheldon, & Kathryn Bond Stockton. (2016). Introduction. GLQ A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies. 22(4). 495–503. 10 indexed citations

14.

Sheldon, Rebekah. (2013). Somatic Capitalism: Reproduction, Futurity, and Feminist Science Fiction. Scholars' Bank (University of Oregon). 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact