Ivan Callus

411 citations
25 papers · 135 indexed · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Ivan Callus

20 papers receiving 107 citations

Peers

Ivan Callus
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Geography, Planning and Development 26
  • Cultural Studies 32
  • Literature and Literary Theory 37
  • Philosophy 33
  • Health Informatics 4
Replace Grace L. Dillon with:
Grace L. Dillon United States
tobias c. van Veen Canada
Claudia Benthien Germany
Daniel Starza Smith United Kingdom
John Lindow United States
Eileen A. Joy United States
Thomas Foster United Kingdom
Diana Espírito Santo Chile
Dora Apel United States
Frédéric Neyrat France
Ivan Callus relative to Grace L. Dillon United States Grace L. Dillon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Grace L. Dillon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ivan Callus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ivan Callus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ivan Callus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ivan Callus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ivan Callus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ivan Callus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ivan Callus. The network helps show where Ivan Callus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Ivan Callus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ivan Callus Line = papers co-authored together Ivan Callus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201234
2 202229
3 200814
4 200411
5 20128
6 20148
7 20206
8 20154
9 20123
10 20153
11
Surviving in Borges: The Memory of Objects after the End of the World
20092
12 20122
13 20192
14
Infertility in science fiction as a feminist issue
20172
15 20151
16
Jalonnante and Parathlipse: Encountering new terminology in Ferdinand de Saussure's researches into anagrams
20021
17 20171
18
Critical Posthumanism, Critical Posthumanisms
20121
19 20041
20 20161

About Ivan Callus

Ivan Callus is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, Cultural Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 25 papers that have together received 135 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Contemporary Literature and Criticism (8 papers), Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (6 papers), Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (5 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (3 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (3 papers), Digital Games and Media (2 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (2 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (26 citations), Cultural Studies (32 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (37 citations), Philosophy (33 citations) and Health Informatics (4 citations). Ivan Callus has collaborated with scholars based in Malta, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Herbrechter, Victor Grech, James Corby and J. Hillis Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Comparative Critical Studies, Forum for Modern Language Studies, European Journal of English Studies, Angelaki and Subjectivity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact