Vaughan S. Radcliffe
- Management Information Systems top 1%
- Accounting top 2%
- Public Administration top 1%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Co-authors
- Richard K. FleischmanTimothy J. FogartyClinton FreeMitchell SteinCrawford SpenceKeith RobsonDavid J. CooperMark Gallagher
- Topics
- Accounting and Organizational Management (27 papers)Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (20 papers)Public Policy and Administration Research (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Vaughan S. Radcliffe
36 papers receiving 916 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Management Information Systems 543
- Accounting 485
- Public Administration 329
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 196
- Strategy and Management 173
Countries citing papers authored by Vaughan S. Radcliffe
This map shows the geographic impact of Vaughan S. Radcliffe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vaughan S. Radcliffe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vaughan S. Radcliffe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Vaughan S. Radcliffe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vaughan S. Radcliffe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vaughan S. Radcliffe. The network helps show where Vaughan S. Radcliffe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Vaughan S. Radcliffe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Vaughan S. Radcliffe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Vaughan S. Radcliffe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Vaughan S. Radcliffe. Vaughan S. Radcliffe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 32 | |
| 3 | 50 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 73 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 78 | |
| 15 | Doing Accounting History: Contributions to the Development of Accounting Thought | 12 |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | Disorder and Harmony: 20th Century Perspectives on Accounting History | 4 |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 27 | |
| 20 | 56 |
About Vaughan S. Radcliffe
Vaughan S. Radcliffe is a scholar working on Public Administration, Management Information Systems and Accounting, having authored 36 papers that have together received 985 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Accounting and Organizational Management (27 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (20 papers) and Public Policy and Administration Research (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (329 citations), Management Information Systems (543 citations) and Accounting (485 citations). Vaughan S. Radcliffe has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Richard K. Fleischman, Timothy J. Fogarty, Clinton Free, Mitchell Stein, Crawford Spence, Keith Robson, David J. Cooper, Mark Gallagher, Ileana Steccolini and Laurence Ferry. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, The Accounting Review and Accounting Organizations and Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.