Tuomo Polvikoski
- Physiology top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.5%
- Neurology top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Neurology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Raimo SulkavaRaj N. KalariaLiisa MyllykangasAuli VerkkoniemiLeena NiinistöAnders PaetauPaul G. IncePentti J. Tienari
- Topics
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (38 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (34 papers)Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomFinlandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Tuomo Polvikoski
91 papers receiving 5.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
- Physiology 1.9k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.5k
- Neurology 1.3k
- Molecular Biology 1.3k
- Neurology 1.2k
Countries citing papers authored by Tuomo Polvikoski
This map shows the geographic impact of Tuomo Polvikoski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tuomo Polvikoski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tuomo Polvikoski more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tuomo Polvikoski
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tuomo Polvikoski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tuomo Polvikoski. The network helps show where Tuomo Polvikoski may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tuomo Polvikoski
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tuomo Polvikoski. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tuomo Polvikoski based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tuomo Polvikoski. Tuomo Polvikoski is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 216 | |
| 8 | 85 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 107 | |
| 11 | 44 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | Delirium is a strong risk factor for dementia in the oldest-old: a population-based cohort studybreakdown → | 369 |
| 15 | 33 | |
| 16 | 396 | |
| 17 | 32 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 407 |
About Tuomo Polvikoski
Tuomo Polvikoski is a scholar working on Neurology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Neurology, having authored 91 papers that have together received 5.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (38 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (34 papers) and Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (1.3k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (1.5k citations) and Neurology (1.2k citations). Tuomo Polvikoski has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Finland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Raimo Sulkava, Raj N. Kalaria, Liisa Myllykangas, Auli Verkkoniemi, Leena Niinistö, Anders Paetau, Paul G. Ince, Pentti J. Tienari, Minna Oinas and Kimmo Kontula. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Nature Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.