Tomasz Chmiel

1000 total citations
22 papers, 755 citations indexed

About

Tomasz Chmiel is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Spectroscopy and Food Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Tomasz Chmiel has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 755 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Biochemistry, 7 papers in Spectroscopy and 6 papers in Food Science. Recurrent topics in Tomasz Chmiel's work include Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (9 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (7 papers) and Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (6 papers). Tomasz Chmiel is often cited by papers focused on Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (9 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (7 papers) and Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (6 papers). Tomasz Chmiel collaborates with scholars based in Poland, United Kingdom and Italy. Tomasz Chmiel's co-authors include Waldemar Wardencki, Tomasz Dymerski, Jacek Namieśnik, Beata Plutowska, Justyna Płotka‐Wasylka, Magdalena Fabjanowicz, Agata Kot‐Wasik, Zofia Mazerska, Agnieszka Bartoszek and Barbara Kusznierewicz and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Food Chemistry and TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Tomasz Chmiel

22 papers receiving 741 citations

Peers

Tomasz Chmiel
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Food Science 259
  • Biomedical Engineering 159
  • Plant Science 152
  • Biochemistry 146
  • Molecular Biology 132
Replace Rosa Di Sanzo with:
Rosa Di Sanzo Italy
Claudia Cimpoiu Romania
Eduardo Morgado Schmidt Brazil
Anamaria Hosu Romania
Terry L. Peppard United States
Muammer Kaplan Türkiye
Michael Popp Austria
Soledad Prats Moya Spain
Karel Ventura Czechia
Marı́a T. Martı́n Spain
Rosa Di Sanzo Italy View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Tomasz Chmiel
Tomasz Chmiel · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Tomasz Chmiel
Tomasz Chmiel · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Tomasz Chmiel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tomasz Chmiel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tomasz Chmiel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tomasz Chmiel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tomasz Chmiel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tomasz Chmiel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tomasz Chmiel. The network helps show where Tomasz Chmiel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tomasz Chmiel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tomasz Chmiel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tomasz Chmiel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tomasz Chmiel. Tomasz Chmiel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 14
2 16
3 46
4 6
5 110
6 8
7 3
8 32
9 45
10 23
11 26
12 1
13 15
14 31
15 17
16 71
17 101
18
Application of gas chromatography, mass spectrometry and olfactometry for quality assessment of selected food products
39
19
Instrumental techniques used for assessment of food quality
7
20
Nos elektroniczny - użyteczne narzędzie w analizie żywności
1

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026