Tom Roehl
Impact in
-
- Quality and Supply Management
- Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Business Strategy and Innovation
- Quality and Management Systems
- International Business and FDI
Papers in
-
- Business Strategy and Innovation 3
- Innovation and Knowledge Management 3
- International Business and FDI 1
- Digital Platforms and Economics 1
-
- Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management 1
- Co-authors
- Takahiro Fujimoto (1 shared paper)Toshihiro Nishiguchi (1 shared paper)Mark Mason (1 shared paper)Shige Makino (2 shared papers)Hidenori Takahashi (1 shared paper)Albert Lejeune (1 shared paper)Joseph T. Mahoney (1 shared paper)Jon P. Alston (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Japanese Studies (3 papers)Academy of Management Perspectives (2 papers)Academy of Management Review (2 papers)Administrative Science Quarterly (1 paper)Asian Business & Management (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanCanada
In The Last Decade
Tom Roehl
11 papers receiving 310 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Management Information Systems 142
- Strategy and Management 199
- Management of Technology and Innovation 81
- Management Science and Operations Research 59
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 40
Countries citing papers authored by Tom Roehl
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Roehl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Roehl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Roehl more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Roehl
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Roehl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Roehl. The network helps show where Tom Roehl may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Tom Roehl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 302 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 29 | |
| 3 | 1993 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1983 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1987 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1985 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 0 |
About Tom Roehl
Tom Roehl is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Management Information Systems, Finance, Accounting and Infectious Diseases, having authored 12 papers that have together received 364 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Business Strategy and Innovation (3 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (1 paper), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (1 paper), Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management (1 paper), International Business and FDI (1 paper) and Digital Platforms and Economics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (142 citations), Strategy and Management (199 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (81 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (59 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (40 citations). Tom Roehl has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Takahiro Fujimoto, Toshihiro Nishiguchi, Mark Mason, Shige Makino, Hidenori Takahashi, Albert Lejeune, Joseph T. Mahoney and Jon P. Alston. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Japanese Studies, Academy of Management Perspectives, Academy of Management Review, Administrative Science Quarterly and Asian Business & Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.