Mike James‐Moore

426 citations
8 papers · 258 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Mike James‐Moore

8 papers receiving 220 citations

Peers

Mike James‐Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Management Information Systems 133
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 85
  • Strategy and Management 134
  • Information Systems and Management 44
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 38
Replace Sam Kurokawa with:
Sam Kurokawa United States
Kirkor Bozdogan United States
Jari Paranko
Poul Israelsen Denmark
R. Murugesh India
Everlin Piccinini Germany
Peter Bruun Denmark
Larry Lapide
Steven R. Clinton United States
Bernd Markus Zunk Austria
Mike James‐Moore relative to Sam Kurokawa United States Sam Kurokawa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Sam Kurokawa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mike James‐Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mike James‐Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mike James‐Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mike James‐Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mike James‐Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mike James‐Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mike James‐Moore. The network helps show where Mike James‐Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Mike James‐Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mike James‐Moore Line = papers co-authored together Mike James‐Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2003127
2 200096
3 200617
4 20067
5 20057
6
The development of the UK lean aerospace initiative
20012
7
Is enterprise resource planning compatible with lean manufacturing - can push be reconciled with pull?
20051
8
ERP; implementation and maintenance in a lean enterprise
20031

About Mike James‐Moore

Mike James‐Moore is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Management of Technology and Innovation and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 8 papers that have together received 258 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quality and Supply Management (4 papers), Technology Assessment and Management (2 papers), Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management (2 papers), Product Development and Customization (1 paper), Public Procurement and Policy (1 paper), Defense, Military, and Policy Studies (1 paper), ERP Systems Implementation and Impact (1 paper) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (133 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (85 citations), Strategy and Management (134 citations), Information Systems and Management (44 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (38 citations). Mike James‐Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Badr Haque, Paul Chapman, Glenn Parry, Andrew Graves, Ann Williamson and Nabil Gindy. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, Supply Chain Management An International Journal, Journal of Engineering Design, International Journal of Business Performance Management and UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact