Tom Fox

19 papers receiving 463 citations

Peers

Tom Fox
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Business and International Management 49
  • Strategy and Management 258
  • Marketing 106
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 55
  • Literature and Literary Theory 50
Replace W. Richard Goe with:
W. Richard Goe United States
Marie‐France Turcotte Canada
David Bollier United States
Virginia Indonesia
Linda Soneryd Sweden
Serge Latouche France
Geoff Lamberton Australia
Melissa Aronczyk United States
Geert Demuijnck France
Tricia D. Olsen United States
Tom Fox relative to W. Richard Goe United States W. Richard Goe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
W. Richard Goe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Fox

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Fox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Fox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Fox more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Fox

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Fox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Fox. The network helps show where Tom Fox may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Fox, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Fox Line = papers co-authored together Tom Fox links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20229
2 202210
3 202216
4 20201
5 20190
6
For the Sake of Argument: An Approach to Teaching Evidence-Based Writing.
20185
7 20146
8 201414
9 20047
10
Understanding the Family Sociologically in Contemporary Namibia
20021
11
Namibia, society, sociology
200217
12
Public sector roles in strengthening corporate social responsibility: a baseline study
2002218
13 200112
14 200029
15 20001
16 19981
17 19952
18
Literacy and Activism: A Response to bell hooks.
19940
19 19935
20
Using Vacant Land to Reshape American Cities
19892

About Tom Fox

Tom Fox is a scholar working on Business and International Management, Linguistics and Language, Safety Research, Music and Ecological Modeling, having authored 25 papers that have together received 563 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (3 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (2 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (2 papers), HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses (2 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (1 paper), Health and Medical Studies (1 paper), Insect and Pesticide Research (1 paper) and Migration and Labor Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (49 citations), Strategy and Management (258 citations), Marketing (106 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (55 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (50 citations). Tom Fox has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Namibia and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Halina Ward, Bruce Howard, Pempelani Mufune, Suresh Canagarajah, Zhaofei Wu, Jason A. Smith, Yann Vitasse, Craig Loehle, Jiří Hulcr and Linda Friedrich. Their work appears in journals such as College Composition and Communication, New Zealand journal of forestry science, Journal of Forestry, Frontiers in Forests and Global Change and Forest Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026