Timo Lorenz

887 total citations
26 papers, 538 citations indexed

About

Timo Lorenz is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Timo Lorenz has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 538 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Social Psychology, 9 papers in Clinical Psychology and 6 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Recurrent topics in Timo Lorenz's work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (8 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (6 papers) and Resilience and Mental Health (5 papers). Timo Lorenz is often cited by papers focused on Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (8 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (6 papers) and Resilience and Mental Health (5 papers). Timo Lorenz collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Timo Lorenz's co-authors include Kathrin Heinitz, Jakub Procházka, Martin Vaculík, Daniel Schulze, Marcus G. Doherr, Mitzi Waltz, Marc Fabri, Marianne van Woerkom, Lisa M. Warner and Henri Pesonen and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Timo Lorenz

22 papers receiving 516 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Timo Lorenz Germany 9 196 166 165 117 94 26 538
Jana Nikitin Switzerland 17 179 0.9× 72 0.4× 372 2.3× 51 0.4× 38 0.4× 52 767
Pamela J. Sawyer United States 8 148 0.8× 159 1.0× 265 1.6× 46 0.4× 46 0.5× 9 755
Samuel D. McQuillin United States 17 314 1.6× 89 0.5× 343 2.1× 220 1.9× 19 0.2× 50 813
Brett Furlonger Australia 13 152 0.8× 137 0.8× 66 0.4× 132 1.1× 26 0.3× 53 619
Béla Birkás Hungary 15 354 1.8× 140 0.8× 237 1.4× 90 0.8× 22 0.2× 46 740
Jill Allen United States 12 222 1.1× 89 0.5× 201 1.2× 93 0.8× 24 0.3× 24 761
Karen S. Basinger United States 8 206 1.1× 244 1.5× 248 1.5× 48 0.4× 18 0.2× 12 617
Sascha Hein United States 15 267 1.4× 69 0.4× 156 0.9× 84 0.7× 13 0.1× 72 657
Marcos Carmona–Halty Chile 10 284 1.4× 27 0.2× 351 2.1× 42 0.4× 81 0.9× 23 697
Erica A. Giammarco Canada 10 431 2.2× 74 0.4× 383 2.3× 29 0.2× 50 0.5× 14 723

Countries citing papers authored by Timo Lorenz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Timo Lorenz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Timo Lorenz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Timo Lorenz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Timo Lorenz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Timo Lorenz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Timo Lorenz. The network helps show where Timo Lorenz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Timo Lorenz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Timo Lorenz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Timo Lorenz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Timo Lorenz. Timo Lorenz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lorenz, Timo, et al.. (2025). Adaptation and validation of the arabic version of the revised compound psychological capital scale (CPC-12R). Gruppe Interaktion Organisation Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO). 56(2). 231–241.
2.
Kern, Marcel, et al.. (2025). Unifying work values: establishing a circular framework based on basic human values. Frontiers in Psychology. 16. 1526799–1526799.
3.
Warner, Lisa M., et al.. (2024). Perceived ageism: A systematic review of existing measures and appraisal of their psychometric quality. Educational Gerontology. 51(8). 839–860. 2 indexed citations
4.
Lorenz, Timo, et al.. (2024). Establishing circularity: development and validation of the circular work value scale (CWVS). Frontiers in Psychology. 15. 1296282–1296282. 2 indexed citations
5.
Lorenz, Timo, et al.. (2024). Assessing age discrimination in workplaces: psychometric exploration of the Workplace Age Discrimination Scale (WADS-G). Frontiers in Psychology. 15. 1345923–1345923. 2 indexed citations
6.
Lorenz, Timo, et al.. (2023). Measuring PERMA+4: validation of the German version of the Positive Functioning at Work Scale. Frontiers in Psychology. 14. 1231299–1231299. 6 indexed citations
7.
8.
Lorenz, Timo, et al.. (2022). Do not make me roll initiative: Assessing the Big Five characteristics of Dungeons & Dragons players in comparison to non-players. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. 1010800–1010800. 1 indexed citations
9.
Pundt, Alexander, et al.. (2022). You are simply not funny: Development and validation of a scale to measure failed humor in leadership. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. 929988–929988. 4 indexed citations
10.
Lorenz, Timo, et al.. (2022). A Positive Psychology Resource for Students? Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the 6 Minutes Diary in a Randomized Control Trial. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. 896741–896741. 1 indexed citations
11.
Lorenz, Timo, et al.. (2022). Validation of the revised Compound PsyCap Scale (CPC-12R) and its measurement invariance across the US and Germany. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. 1075031–1075031. 14 indexed citations
12.
Lorenz, Timo, et al.. (2022). You’re Prettier When You Smile: Construction and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Microaggressions Against Women in the Workplace. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. 809862–809862. 12 indexed citations
13.
Procházka, Jakub, et al.. (2021). Measuring psychological capital: Revision of the Compound Psychological Capital Scale (CPC-12). PLoS ONE. 16(3). e0247114–e0247114. 33 indexed citations
14.
Lorenz, Timo, et al.. (2021). Adaptation and validation of a German version of the Strengths Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) questionnaire. PLoS ONE. 16(1). e0245127–e0245127. 3 indexed citations
15.
Lorenz, Timo, et al.. (2021). Lost in Translation or Just Too Pragmatic?. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(1). 124–135. 2 indexed citations
16.
Pesonen, Henri, Mitzi Waltz, Marc Fabri, et al.. (2021). Stakeholders’ views on effective employment support strategies for autistic university students and graduates entering the world of work. Advances in Autism. 7(1). 16–27. 11 indexed citations
17.
Heinitz, Kathrin, et al.. (2018). Positive organizational behavior: Longitudinal effects on subjective well-being. PLoS ONE. 13(6). e0198588–e0198588. 27 indexed citations
18.
Schulze, Daniel, Kathrin Heinitz, & Timo Lorenz. (2018). Comparative organizational research starts with sound measurement: Validity and invariance of Turker’s corporate social responsibility scale in five cross-cultural samples. PLoS ONE. 13(11). e0207331–e0207331. 5 indexed citations
19.
Lorenz, Timo, et al.. (2016). Measuring Psychological Capital: Construction and Validation of the Compound PsyCap Scale (CPC-12). PLoS ONE. 11(4). e0152892–e0152892. 190 indexed citations
20.
Lorenz, Timo & Kathrin Heinitz. (2014). Aspergers – Different, Not Less: Occupational Strengths and Job Interests of Individuals with Asperger's Syndrome. PLoS ONE. 9(6). e100358–e100358. 64 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jana Nikitin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Pamela J. Sawyer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Samuel D. McQuillin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Brett Furlonger Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Béla Birkás Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jill Allen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Karen S. Basinger Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sascha Hein Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marcos Carmona–Halty Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Erica A. Giammarco
Rankless by CCL
2026