Tim Wulf
Impact in
-
- Media Influence and Health
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Media, Gender, and Advertising
Papers in
-
- Media Influence and Health 15
-
- Media, Gender, and Advertising 11
- Co-authors
- Diana Rieger (10 shared papers)Johannes Breuer (8 shared papers)Josephine B. Schmitt (5 shared papers)Frank M. Schneider (2 shared papers)Julia Kneer (3 shared papers)Gary Bente (3 shared papers)Lena Frischlich (2 shared papers)Nicholas David Bowman (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Psychology of Popular Media (4 papers)Media and Communication (4 papers)Studies in Communication and Media (3 papers)International Journal of Advertising (2 papers)Computers in Human Behavior (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Tim Wulf
25 papers receiving 589 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Literature and Literary Theory 203
- Gender Studies 122
- Social Psychology 189
- Applied Psychology 45
- Sociology and Political Science 369
Countries citing papers authored by Tim Wulf
This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Wulf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Wulf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Wulf more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Wulf
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Wulf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Wulf. The network helps show where Tim Wulf may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tim Wulf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 87 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 76 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 71 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 47 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 28 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 21 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 21 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 20 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 7 |
About Tim Wulf
Tim Wulf is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 612 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Influence and Health (15 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (11 papers), Nostalgia and Consumer Behavior (9 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers), Digital Games and Media (4 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (3 papers), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (2 papers) and Persona Design and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (203 citations), Gender Studies (122 citations), Social Psychology (189 citations), Applied Psychology (45 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (369 citations). Tim Wulf has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Diana Rieger, Johannes Breuer, Josephine B. Schmitt, Frank M. Schneider, Julia Kneer, Gary Bente, Lena Frischlich, Nicholas David Bowman, John A. Velez and James Alex Bonus. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology of Popular Media, Media and Communication, Studies in Communication and Media, International Journal of Advertising and Computers in Human Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.