Nina Haferkamp

1.1k total citations
11 papers, 693 citations indexed

About

Nina Haferkamp is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication and Human-Computer Interaction. According to data from OpenAlex, Nina Haferkamp has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 693 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Communication and 4 papers in Human-Computer Interaction. Recurrent topics in Nina Haferkamp's work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers) and Team Dynamics and Performance (3 papers). Nina Haferkamp is often cited by papers focused on Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers) and Team Dynamics and Performance (3 papers). Nina Haferkamp collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Italy. Nina Haferkamp's co-authors include Nicole C. Krämer, Sabrina C. Eimler, Nicole Kraemer, Conor Linehan, Stephan Winter, Andreas Harrer and Laura Hoffmann and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking and Entertainment Computing.

In The Last Decade

Nina Haferkamp

10 papers receiving 646 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nina Haferkamp Germany 6 504 199 159 137 102 11 693
T. Makana Chock United States 16 478 0.9× 196 1.0× 157 1.0× 225 1.6× 34 0.3× 27 769
Mariska Kleemans Netherlands 15 430 0.9× 157 0.8× 283 1.8× 254 1.9× 156 1.5× 50 778
Jang Ho Moon South Korea 6 517 1.0× 84 0.4× 126 0.8× 122 0.9× 89 0.9× 15 748
Anja Stević Austria 13 510 1.0× 152 0.8× 141 0.9× 84 0.6× 145 1.4× 30 718
Amber L. Ferris United States 6 380 0.8× 91 0.5× 120 0.8× 107 0.8× 70 0.7× 8 551
Hui-Tzu Grace Chou United States 6 651 1.3× 121 0.6× 199 1.3× 155 1.1× 174 1.7× 12 792
Maèva Flayelle Switzerland 14 625 1.2× 241 1.2× 71 0.4× 245 1.8× 153 1.5× 27 838
Erin E. Hollenbaugh United States 9 563 1.1× 81 0.4× 206 1.3× 62 0.5× 86 0.8× 10 719
Jessica Marrington Australia 6 456 0.9× 190 1.0× 137 0.9× 58 0.4× 94 0.9× 8 670
Fenne große Deters Germany 9 483 1.0× 197 1.0× 132 0.8× 107 0.8× 91 0.9× 15 738

Countries citing papers authored by Nina Haferkamp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Haferkamp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Haferkamp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Haferkamp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Haferkamp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Haferkamp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Haferkamp. The network helps show where Nina Haferkamp may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina Haferkamp

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina Haferkamp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina Haferkamp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina Haferkamp. Nina Haferkamp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
2.
Hoffmann, Laura, et al.. (2012). A matter of perspective: The impact of first- and third-person perspective on the perception of virtual group discussions. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds. 4(3). 239–257. 2 indexed citations
3.
Winter, Stephan, et al.. (2011). The Digital Quest for Love – The Role of Relationship Status in Self-Presentation on Social Networking Sites. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(2). 2 indexed citations
4.
Haferkamp, Nina, et al.. (2011). Jumping the Border in the Blogosphere?. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 1(2). 14–28. 1 indexed citations
5.
Haferkamp, Nina, et al.. (2011). Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus? Examining Gender Differences in Self-Presentation on Social Networking Sites. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking. 15(2). 91–98. 274 indexed citations
6.
Haferkamp, Nina. (2011). Nancy K. Baym (2010): Personal Connections in the Digital Age. Digital Media and Society Series. Cambridge: Polity. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft. 59(3). 430–431. 30 indexed citations
7.
Haferkamp, Nina & Nicole C. Krämer. (2010). Krisenkommunikation in Virtuellen Realitäten – Evaluation eines Serious Games zum Training von Soft Skills in Krisenstäben. 41(4). 357–373. 3 indexed citations
8.
Haferkamp, Nina & Nicole C. Krämer. (2010). Social Comparison 2.0: Examining the Effects of Online Profiles on Social-Networking Sites. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking. 14(5). 309–314. 326 indexed citations
9.
Haferkamp, Nina, et al.. (2010). Training disaster communication by means of serious games in virtual environments. Entertainment Computing. 2(2). 81–88. 43 indexed citations
10.
Haferkamp, Nina & Nicole C. Krämer. (2009). When I Was Your Age, Pluto Was a Planet: Impression Management and Need to Belong as Motives for Joining Groups on Social Networking Sites. 1–33. 7 indexed citations
11.
Harrer, Andreas, et al.. (2008). Ergebnisse und Fragestellungen aus Psychologie und Informatik zur Analyse von Interaktionen in Online-Communities und Potenziale interdisziplinärer Forschung.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026