Nina Haferkamp
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Communication top 5%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 2%
- Education top 10%
- Co-authors
- Nicole C. KrämerSabrina C. EimlerNicole KraemerConor LinehanStephan WinterLaura HoffmannAndreas Harrer
- Topics
- Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers)Social Media and Politics (3 papers)Team Dynamics and Performance (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaCyberpsychology Behavior and Social NetworkingEntertainment Computing
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomItaly
In The Last Decade
Nina Haferkamp
10 papers receiving 646 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Sociology and Political Science 504
- Clinical Psychology 199
- Communication 159
- Literature and Literary Theory 137
- Education 102
Countries citing papers authored by Nina Haferkamp
This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Haferkamp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Haferkamp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Haferkamp more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Haferkamp
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Haferkamp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Haferkamp. The network helps show where Nina Haferkamp may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina Haferkamp
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina Haferkamp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina Haferkamp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina Haferkamp. Nina Haferkamp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | The Digital Quest for Love – The Role of Relationship Status in Self-Presentation on Social Networking Sites | 2 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 274 | |
| 6 | 30 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 326 | |
| 9 | 43 | |
| 10 | When I Was Your Age, Pluto Was a Planet: Impression Management and Need to Belong as Motives for Joining Groups on Social Networking Sites | 7 |
| 11 | Ergebnisse und Fragestellungen aus Psychologie und Informatik zur Analyse von Interaktionen in Online-Communities und Potenziale interdisziplinärer Forschung | 0 |
About Nina Haferkamp
Nina Haferkamp is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Communication and Marketing, having authored 11 papers that have together received 693 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers) and Team Dynamics and Performance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (159 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (137 citations) and Applied Psychology (61 citations). Nina Haferkamp has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Nicole C. Krämer, Sabrina C. Eimler, Nicole Kraemer, Conor Linehan, Stephan Winter, Laura Hoffmann and Andreas Harrer. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking and Entertainment Computing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.