Mina Tsay‐Vogel

885 total citations
23 papers, 586 citations indexed

About

Mina Tsay‐Vogel is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Gender Studies and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Mina Tsay‐Vogel has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 586 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 11 papers in Gender Studies and 9 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Mina Tsay‐Vogel's work include Media Influence and Health (17 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (11 papers) and Media Studies and Communication (7 papers). Mina Tsay‐Vogel is often cited by papers focused on Media Influence and Health (17 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (11 papers) and Media Studies and Communication (7 papers). Mina Tsay‐Vogel collaborates with scholars based in United States, Italy and South Korea. Mina Tsay‐Vogel's co-authors include K. Maja Krakowiak, James Shanahan, Nancy Signorielli, Tilo Hartmann, Li Zhang, James J. Cummings, Robin L. Nabi, Melissa K. Holt, Jinhee Kim and Mary Beth Oliver and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, New Media & Society and Human Communication Research.

In The Last Decade

Mina Tsay‐Vogel

22 papers receiving 547 citations

Peers

Mina Tsay‐Vogel
Julia K. Woolley United States
Tim Wulf Germany
Jang Ho Moon South Korea
John M. Tchernev United States
Vincent Cicchirillo United States
Qingwen Dong United States
John A. Velez United States
Mariska Kleemans Netherlands
Tim Cole United States
Julia K. Woolley United States
Mina Tsay‐Vogel
Citations per year, relative to Mina Tsay‐Vogel Mina Tsay‐Vogel (= 1×) peers Julia K. Woolley

Countries citing papers authored by Mina Tsay‐Vogel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mina Tsay‐Vogel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mina Tsay‐Vogel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mina Tsay‐Vogel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mina Tsay‐Vogel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mina Tsay‐Vogel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mina Tsay‐Vogel. The network helps show where Mina Tsay‐Vogel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mina Tsay‐Vogel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mina Tsay‐Vogel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mina Tsay‐Vogel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mina Tsay‐Vogel. Mina Tsay‐Vogel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gui, Marco, James Shanahan, & Mina Tsay‐Vogel. (2021). Theorizing inconsistent media selection in the digital environment. The Information Society. 37(4). 247–261. 7 indexed citations
2.
Tsay‐Vogel, Mina & K. Maja Krakowiak. (2019). The virtues and vices of social comparisons: examining assimilative and contrastive emotional reactions to characters in a narrative. Motivation and Emotion. 43(4). 636–647. 7 indexed citations
3.
Tsay‐Vogel, Mina, et al.. (2018). Online original TV series: Examining portrayals of violence in popular binge-watched programs and social reality perceptions.. Psychology of Popular Media. 9(2). 155–164. 8 indexed citations
4.
Krakowiak, K. Maja & Mina Tsay‐Vogel. (2017). Are Good Characters Better for Us? The Effect of Morality Salience on Entertainment Selection and Recovery Outcomes. Mass Communication & Society. 21(3). 320–344. 5 indexed citations
5.
Holt, Melissa K., et al.. (2016). Multidisciplinary Approaches to Research on Bullying in Adolescence. Adolescent Research Review. 2(1). 1–10. 16 indexed citations
6.
Nickerson, Amanda B., Thomas Hugh Feeley, & Mina Tsay‐Vogel. (2016). Applying Mass Communication Theory to Bystander Intervention in Bullying. Adolescent Research Review. 2(1). 37–48. 5 indexed citations
7.
Tsay‐Vogel, Mina & K. Maja Krakowiak. (2016). Inspirational Reality TV: The Prosocial Effects of Lifestyle Transforming Reality Programs on Elevation and Altruism. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 60(4). 567–586. 29 indexed citations
8.
Tsay‐Vogel, Mina & K. Maja Krakowiak. (2016). Effects of Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motivations on Film Enjoyment Through Moral Disengagement. Communication Research Reports. 33(1). 54–60. 11 indexed citations
9.
Kim, Jinhee & Mina Tsay‐Vogel. (2016). Enjoyment and Appreciation as Motivators for Coping: Exploring the Therapeutic Effects of Media Messages on Perceived Threat. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 10. 23. 5 indexed citations
10.
Tsay‐Vogel, Mina, James Shanahan, & Nancy Signorielli. (2016). Social media cultivating perceptions of privacy: A 5-year analysis of privacy attitudes and self-disclosure behaviors among Facebook users. New Media & Society. 20(1). 141–161. 150 indexed citations
11.
Chung, Deborah S., et al.. (2015). Who’s Following Twitter? Coverage of the Microblogging Phenomenon by U.S. Cable News Networks. International journal of communication. 9. 25. 3 indexed citations
12.
Tsay‐Vogel, Mina, et al.. (2015). Beyond Heroes and Villains: Examining Explanatory Mechanisms Underlying Moral Disengagement. Mass Communication & Society. 19(3). 230–252. 23 indexed citations
13.
Tsay‐Vogel, Mina. (2015). Me versus them: Third-person effects among Facebook users. New Media & Society. 18(9). 1956–1972. 35 indexed citations
14.
Tsay‐Vogel, Mina, et al.. (2015). Fandom and the search for meaning: Examining communal involvement with popular media beyond pleasure.. Psychology of Popular Media Culture. 6(1). 32–47. 26 indexed citations
15.
Tsay‐Vogel, Mina & Mary Beth Oliver. (2014). Is Watching Others Self-Disclose Enjoyable?. Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications. 26(3). 111–124. 6 indexed citations
16.
Hartmann, Tilo, K. Maja Krakowiak, & Mina Tsay‐Vogel. (2014). How Violent Video Games Communicate Violence: A Literature Review and Content Analysis of Moral Disengagement Factors. Communication Monographs. 81(3). 310–332. 71 indexed citations
17.
Krakowiak, K. Maja & Mina Tsay‐Vogel. (2014). The Dual Role of Morally Ambiguous Characters: Examining the Effect of Morality Salience on Narrative Responses. Human Communication Research. 41(3). 390–411. 27 indexed citations
18.
Tsay‐Vogel, Mina, et al.. (2014). Exploring a Moral Continuum: Examining Explanatory Mechanisms Underlying Moral Disengagement Across Characters of Different Moral Complexities. 1 indexed citations
19.
Krakowiak, K. Maja & Mina Tsay‐Vogel. (2013). What Makes Characters’ Bad Behaviors Acceptable? The Effects of Character Motivation and Outcome on Perceptions, Character Liking, and Moral Disengagement. Mass Communication & Society. 16(2). 179–199. 57 indexed citations
20.
Tsay‐Vogel, Mina, et al.. (2013). Theorizing parasocial interactions based on authenticity: The development of a media figure classification scheme.. Psychology of Popular Media Culture. 3(2). 66–78. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026