Thomas W. Overholt

30 total papers · 459 total citations
22 papers, 124 citations indexed

About

Thomas W. Overholt is a scholar working on Religious studies, Sociology and Political Science and Archeology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas W. Overholt has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 124 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Religious studies, 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Archeology. Recurrent topics in Thomas W. Overholt's work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (13 papers), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (4 papers) and Archaeology and Historical Studies (3 papers). Thomas W. Overholt is often cited by papers focused on Biblical Studies and Interpretation (13 papers), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (4 papers) and Archaeology and Historical Studies (3 papers). Thomas W. Overholt collaborates with scholars based in United States. Thomas W. Overholt's co-authors include H. G. M. Williamson, J. Baird Callicott, Christopher Vecsey, Christopher R. Seitz, Robert P. Gordon, Stephen Phillips, Roy W. Perrett, Roger T. Ames, Graham Parkes and David L. Hall and has published in prestigious journals such as Ethnohistory, Journal of Biblical Literature and The American Indian Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Thomas W. Overholt

15 papers receiving 83 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Thomas W. Overholt 62 55 29 13 12 22 124
Lloyd R. Bailey 80 1.3× 58 1.1× 54 1.9× 11 0.8× 12 1.0× 18 173
Ken Stone 78 1.3× 103 1.9× 26 0.9× 27 2.1× 14 1.2× 20 177
Robert C. Dentan 76 1.2× 61 1.1× 29 1.0× 7 0.5× 8 0.7× 21 137
Joseph A. Marchal 72 1.2× 65 1.2× 19 0.7× 21 1.6× 11 0.9× 23 122
Bruce C. Birch 72 1.2× 61 1.1× 15 0.5× 10 0.8× 11 0.9× 18 127
Timothy Beal 48 0.8× 58 1.1× 19 0.7× 10 0.8× 19 1.6× 28 133
Vincent L. Wimbush 70 1.1× 85 1.5× 17 0.6× 11 0.8× 24 2.0× 22 148
Jeremy Schipper 41 0.7× 52 0.9× 18 0.6× 15 1.2× 7 0.6× 24 102
Daniel L. Smith‐Christopher 112 1.8× 80 1.5× 65 2.2× 19 1.5× 12 1.0× 24 156
Herbert G. May 86 1.4× 57 1.0× 75 2.6× 4 0.3× 9 0.8× 26 190

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas W. Overholt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas W. Overholt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas W. Overholt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas W. Overholt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas W. Overholt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas W. Overholt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas W. Overholt. The network helps show where Thomas W. Overholt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas W. Overholt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas W. Overholt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas W. Overholt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas W. Overholt. Thomas W. Overholt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026