Graham Parkes

742 citations
42 papers · 269 indexed · h-index 9
Topics
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (10 papers)Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (9 papers)Chinese history and philosophy (9 papers)
Journals
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPacific AffairsPhilosophy East and West

In The Last Decade

Graham Parkes

31 papers receiving 149 citations

Peers

Graham Parkes
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Philosophy 108
  • Sociology and Political Science 101
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 45
  • Social Psychology 37
  • Cultural Studies 33
Replace Dalia Judovitz with:
Dalia Judovitz United States
Edith Wyschogrod United States
Deborah Steiner United States
Samuel Shirley United Kingdom
Walter H. Capps United States
Ronald Speirs United Kingdom
Clare Carlisle United Kingdom
Rainer María Rilke
荘子
Charles Bambach France
Graham Parkes relative to Dalia Judovitz United States Dalia Judovitz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Dalia Judovitz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Graham Parkes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Graham Parkes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graham Parkes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graham Parkes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Graham Parkes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graham Parkes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graham Parkes. The network helps show where Graham Parkes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Graham Parkes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Graham Parkes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Graham Parkes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Graham Parkes. Graham Parkes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 6
2 1
3 3
4
Thinking Images: Doing Philosophy in Film and Video
1
5 13
6 2
7
Nietzsche and Music
6
8 7
9 2
10 25
11 4
12
Heidegger and Asian Thought
13
13 0
14
The Transmutation of Emotion in Rinzai Zen and Nietzsche
1
15 67
16 1
17 0
18 2
19 15
20 4

About Graham Parkes

Graham Parkes is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cultural Studies and Religious studies, having authored 42 papers that have together received 269 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (10 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (9 papers) and Chinese history and philosophy (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (108 citations), General Psychology (7 citations) and Cultural Studies (33 citations). Graham Parkes has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include John C. Maraldo, Kathleen Marie Higgins, David Pellauer, Keiji Nishitani, François Jullien, David L. Hall, Herbert V. Guenther, J. Baird Callicott, Peter D. Hershock and Thomas W. Overholt. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Pacific Affairs and Philosophy East and West.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026