H. G. M. Williamson
- Religious studies top 0.01%
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation 150
- Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies 6
- Archeology top 0.2%
- Archaeology and Historical Studies 79
- Ancient Egypt and Archaeology 22
- Ancient Near East History 18
- Development top 2%
- Development, Ethics, and Society 22
-
- Historical and Linguistic Studies 44
- Religion, Society, and Development 6
- History top 2%
- Co-authors
- Ephraim SternWilliam L. HolladayMartin Jan MulderJoseph BlenkinsoppThomas W. OverholtSara JaphetJ. Alberto SogginMoshe Weinfeld
- Journals
- Journal of Biblical Literature (6 papers)Journal of the American Oriental Society (1 paper)Tel Aviv (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSlovakia
In The Last Decade
H. G. M. Williamson
149 papers receiving 677 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Religious studies 816
- Archeology 612
- Development 113
- Sociology and Political Science 416
- History 68
Countries citing papers authored by H. G. M. Williamson
This map shows the geographic impact of H. G. M. Williamson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. G. M. Williamson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. G. M. Williamson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by H. G. M. Williamson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. G. M. Williamson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. G. M. Williamson. The network helps show where H. G. M. Williamson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. G. M. Williamson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Isaiah 6-12: A Critical and Exegetical Commentary | 2018 | 5 |
| 2 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 0 | |
| 7 | Reading from right to left : essays on the Hebrew Bible in honour of David J.A. Clines | 2003 | 9 |
| 8 | 2000 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1999 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 18 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1991 | 9 | |
| 16 | 1991 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1991 | 23 | |
| 18 | 1989 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1984 | 18 |
About H. G. M. Williamson
H. G. M. Williamson is a scholar working on Religious studies, Archeology and Development, having authored 198 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (150 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (79 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (44 papers), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (22 papers), Development, Ethics, and Society (22 papers), Ancient Near East History (18 papers), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (6 papers) and Religion, Society, and Development (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (816 citations), Archeology (612 citations) and Development (113 citations). H. G. M. Williamson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Ephraim Stern, William L. Holladay, Martin Jan Mulder, Joseph Blenkinsopp, Thomas W. Overholt, Sara Japhet, J. Alberto Soggin, Moshe Weinfeld, Erhard S. Gerstenberger and David J. A. Clines. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biblical Literature, Journal of the American Oriental Society and Tel Aviv.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.