Roger T. Ames

4.3k citations
98 papers · 2.0k indexed · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Roger T. Ames

84 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Roger T. Ames
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Religious studies 184
  • Cultural Studies 299
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.3k
  • Philosophy 284
  • Social Psychology 335
Replace Edward Slingerland with:
Edward Slingerland Canada
Tu Weiming United States
Thomas Laqueur United States
Jan Assmann Germany
Luther H. Martin United States
Mieke Bal Netherlands
René Girard United States
Harold Bloom United States
Karen E. Fields United States
Teresa de Lauretis United States
Roger T. Ames relative to Edward Slingerland Canada Edward Slingerland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Edward Slingerland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roger T. Ames

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roger T. Ames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roger T. Ames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roger T. Ames more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roger T. Ames

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roger T. Ames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roger T. Ames. The network helps show where Roger T. Ames may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Roger T. Ames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roger T. Ames Line = papers co-authored together Roger T. Ames links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20231
2 20201
3 20162
4 20150
5 20153
6 20122
7
Sun Bin : the art of warfare : a translation of the classic Chinese work of philosophy and strategy
20036
8
Daodejing: making this life significant; a philosophical translation
200368
9 2000161
10
Self as Image in Asian Theory and Practice
199813
11 19952
12 199573
13
Sun-tzu : the art of warfare : the first English translation incorporating the recently discovered Yin-chʿüeh-shan texts
19931
14 19933
15 199039
16 198938
17 198619
18 198418
19 198411
20
Lao Tzu : text, notes, and comments
197712

About Roger T. Ames

Roger T. Ames is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, General Psychology, Cultural Studies and Religious studies, having authored 98 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (49 papers), Japanese History and Culture (6 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (4 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (3 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (2 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (2 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (1 paper) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (184 citations), Cultural Studies (299 citations), Sociology and Political Science (1.3k citations), Philosophy (284 citations) and Social Psychology (335 citations). Roger T. Ames has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David L. Hall, Philip J. Ivanhoe, Henry Rosemont, Bryan W. Van Norden, Paul R. Goldin, Wimal Dissanayake, Thomas P. Kasulis, Michael Saso, Peter D. Hershock and Alan K. L. Chan. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy East and West, Pacific Affairs, Dao, The Journal of Asian Studies and Journal of Business Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026