J. Andrew Dearman

91 total papers · 578 total citations
33 papers, 167 citations indexed

About

J. Andrew Dearman is a scholar working on Religious studies, Archeology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Andrew Dearman has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 167 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Religious studies, 14 papers in Archeology and 10 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in J. Andrew Dearman's work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (24 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (14 papers) and African history and culture analysis (5 papers). J. Andrew Dearman is often cited by papers focused on Biblical Studies and Interpretation (24 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (14 papers) and African history and culture analysis (5 papers). J. Andrew Dearman collaborates with scholars based in United States and South Africa. J. Andrew Dearman's co-authors include Elizabeth Mullen, J. A. Emerton, Baruch A. Levine, Piotr Bieńkowski, Robert L. Hubbard and David Hopkins and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biblical Literature, Journal of the American Oriental Society and Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research.

In The Last Decade

J. Andrew Dearman

25 papers receiving 104 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
J. Andrew Dearman	115	84	59	14	12	33	167
G. W. Ahlström	123 1.1×	141 1.7×	40 0.7×	16 1.1×	12 1.0×	35	190
Roland de Vaux	175 1.5×	140 1.7×	88 1.5×	16 1.1×	12 1.0×	26	290
Herbert G. May	86 0.7×	75 0.9×	57 1.0×	16 1.1×	13 1.1×	26	190
Shemaryahu Talmon	138 1.2×	98 1.2×	96 1.6×	16 1.1×	7 0.6×	42	214
James K. Hoffmeier	76 0.7×	155 1.8×	32 0.5×	15 1.1×	22 1.8×	42	219
Jack Miller	106 0.9×	115 1.4×	57 1.0×	9 0.6×	17 1.4×	39	205
Sidnie White Crawford	114 1.0×	102 1.2×	70 1.2×	14 1.0×	14 1.2×	31	158
Kevin G. O’Connell	83 0.7×	86 1.0×	46 0.8×	10 0.7×	19 1.6×	29	157
Millar Burrows	102 0.9×	80 1.0×	71 1.2×	7 0.5×	4 0.3×	26	182
Abraham Malamat	67 0.6×	132 1.6×	22 0.4×	7 0.5×	12 1.0×	32	176

Countries citing papers authored by J. Andrew Dearman

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Andrew Dearman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Andrew Dearman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Andrew Dearman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Andrew Dearman

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Andrew Dearman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Andrew Dearman. The network helps show where J. Andrew Dearman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Andrew Dearman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Andrew Dearman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Andrew Dearman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Andrew Dearman. J. Andrew Dearman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact