William Robertson Smith

28 total papers · 919 total citations
6 papers, 113 citations indexed

About

William Robertson Smith is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Religious studies. According to data from OpenAlex, William Robertson Smith has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 113 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 3 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 2 papers in Religious studies. Recurrent topics in William Robertson Smith's work include Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (3 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers) and Religion and Society Interactions (1 paper). William Robertson Smith is often cited by papers focused on Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (3 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers) and Religion and Society Interactions (1 paper). William Robertson Smith collaborates with scholars based in . William Robertson Smith's co-authors include Julius Wellhausen, James Muilenburg, Robert Alun Jones and Robert A. Segal and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biblical Literature, Cambridge University Press eBooks and Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).

In The Last Decade

William Robertson Smith

4 papers receiving 82 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
William Robertson Smith	58	41	27	27	14	6	113
Mark Golden	57 1.0×	21 0.5×	60 2.2×	46 1.7×	14 1.0×	9	157
Carlin A. Barton	84 1.4×	63 1.5×	91 3.4×	58 2.1×	39 2.8×	9	221
John L. White	79 1.4×	92 2.2×	35 1.3×	38 1.4×	14 1.0×	8	155
Marshall D. Johnson	59 1.0×	102 2.5×	19 0.7×	55 2.0×	7 0.5×	9	133
James Moffatt	61 1.1×	81 2.0×	17 0.6×	34 1.3×	7 0.5×	8	119
Malcolm R. Green	42 0.7×	21 0.5×	68 2.5×	14 0.5×	11 0.8×	7	125
Gerardus van der Leeuw	92 1.6×	25 0.6×	33 1.2×	11 0.4×	45 3.2×	8	173
Donna F. Wilson	83 1.4×	84 2.0×	57 2.1×	83 3.1×	17 1.2×	5	177
Neil Elliott	65 1.1×	105 2.6×	11 0.4×	38 1.4×	22 1.6×	9	140
Robert Littlewood	82 1.4×	37 0.9×	48 1.8×	46 1.7×	45 3.2×	5	238

Countries citing papers authored by William Robertson Smith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Robertson Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Robertson Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Robertson Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Robertson Smith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Robertson Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Robertson Smith. The network helps show where William Robertson Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Robertson Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Robertson Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Robertson Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Robertson Smith. William Robertson Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact