G. W. Ahlström

738 citations
35 papers · 190 indexed · h-index 9
Topics
Biblical Studies and Interpretation (22 papers)Archaeology and Historical Studies (21 papers)Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (8 papers)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

G. W. Ahlström

25 papers receiving 97 citations

Peers

G. W. Ahlström
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Archeology 141
  • Religious studies 123
  • Sociology and Political Science 40
  • History 16
  • Paleontology 12
Replace P. Kyle McCarter with:
P. Kyle McCarter United States
Diana Edelman United Kingdom
André Lemaire France
Henri Cazelles France
George E. Mendenhall United States
Manfred Oeming Germany
William H. C. Propp United States
Reinhard G. Kratz Germany
Gregorio del Olmo Lete Spain
Naḥmān Avîgād
G. W. Ahlström relative to P. Kyle McCarter United States P. Kyle McCarter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
P. Kyle McCarter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. W. Ahlström

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. W. Ahlström's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. W. Ahlström with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. W. Ahlström more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. W. Ahlström

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. W. Ahlström. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. W. Ahlström. The network helps show where G. W. Ahlström may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. W. Ahlström

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. W. Ahlström. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. W. Ahlström based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. W. Ahlström. G. W. Ahlström is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
An Archaeological Picture of Iron Age Religions in Ancient Palestine
1
2
The History of Ancient Palestine
15
3
The Role of Archaeological and Literary Remains in Reconstructing Israel's History
6
4 3
5 3
6 5
7 3
8 1
9 3
10 6
11 12
12 0
13 1
14 5
15 11
16
Transitions in Biblical scholarship
5
17 1
18 1
19
Aspects of syncretism in israelite religion
11
20 5

About G. W. Ahlström

G. W. Ahlström is a scholar working on Religious studies, Archeology and Archeology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 190 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (22 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (21 papers) and Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (123 citations), Archeology (141 citations) and Development (11 citations). G. W. Ahlström has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Diana Edelman, Baruch A. Levine, Harry M. Orlinsky, J. A. Emerton, Graham Davies, Thomas W. Overholt, J. R. Spencer, W. F. Albright and David Noel Freedman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Oriental Society, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research and Vetus Testamentum.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026