Thomas Keymer
-
- Literature: history, themes, analysis 3
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 2
- French Literature and Criticism 1
- Joseph Conrad and Literature 1
- Museology top 10%
- History top 10%
- Scottish History and National Identity 3
-
- Renaissance Literature and Culture 2
-
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 1
-
- Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Peter SaborJohn A. DussingerKathryn SutherlandMurray PittockGillian RussellJudith PascoeC. Mark FanningMichael Scrivener
- Journals
- The Modern Language Review (1 paper)Eighteenth-Century Fiction (1 paper)TLS, the Times literary supplement/Times literary supplement on CD-ROM/TLS. Times literary supplement (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Thomas Keymer
10 papers receiving 36 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Literature and Literary Theory 70
- Museology 10
- History 17
- Classics 5
- Anthropology 12
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Keymer
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Keymer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Keymer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Keymer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Keymer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Keymer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Keymer. The network helps show where Thomas Keymer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Keymer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 2 | Poetics of the Pillory : English Literature and Seditious Libel, 1660-1820 | 2019 | 1 |
| 3 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 12 | |
| 12 | Keep the clutter | 2003 | 0 |
| 13 | 2002 | 31 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 1 |
About Thomas Keymer
Thomas Keymer is a scholar working on Classics, Literature and Literary Theory, History, Cultural Studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 96 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scottish History and National Identity (3 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (2 papers), French Literature and Criticism (1 paper), Joseph Conrad and Literature (1 paper), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper) and Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (70 citations), Museology (10 citations), History (17 citations), Classics (5 citations) and Anthropology (12 citations). Thomas Keymer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter Sabor, John A. Dussinger, Kathryn Sutherland, Murray Pittock, Gillian Russell, Judith Pascoe, C. Mark Fanning, Michael Scrivener, Saree Makdisi and Ian Campbell Ross. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Eighteenth-Century Fiction, TLS, the Times literary supplement/Times literary supplement on CD-ROM/TLS. Times literary supplement, XVII-XVIII and Cambridge University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.