Eighteenth-Century Fiction

658 papers and 1.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 658 papers published in Eighteenth-Century Fiction in the last decades have received a total of 1.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Eighteenth-Century Fiction usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (323 papers), History (157 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (117 papers) specifically the topics of Literature: history, themes, analysis (187 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (83 papers) and Historical Economic and Social Studies (53 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Eighteenth-Century Fiction are Margaret Anne Doody, J. A. Downie, Juliet McMaster, Alistair M. Duckworth, Paula R. Backscheider, David Marshall, William B. Warner, Cynthia Wall, John A. Dussinger and Maximillian E. Novak.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Eighteenth-Century Fiction

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Eighteenth-Century Fiction. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Eighteenth-Century Fiction.

Countries where authors publish in Eighteenth-Century Fiction

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Eighteenth-Century Fiction. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Eighteenth-Century Fiction with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eighteenth-Century Fiction more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025