Greg Kucich

422 total citations
14 papers, 48 citations indexed

About

Greg Kucich is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Greg Kucich has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 48 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 1 paper in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Greg Kucich's work include Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (4 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (4 papers) and Poetry Analysis and Criticism (2 papers). Greg Kucich is often cited by papers focused on Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (4 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (4 papers) and Poetry Analysis and Criticism (2 papers). Greg Kucich collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ghana. Greg Kucich's co-authors include Tim Fulford, Kathryn Sutherland, Michael Scrivener, Gillian Russell, Saree Makdisi, Peter Sabor, Jon Mee, Judith Pascoe, Murray Pittock and Paul Magnuson and has published in prestigious journals such as The Modern Language Review, Studies in Romanticism and Nineteenth Century Contexts.

In The Last Decade

Greg Kucich

8 papers receiving 27 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Greg Kucich United States	5	23	19	16	8	8	14	48
Izaak Walton United Kingdom	5	20 0.9×	23 1.2×	12 0.8×	6 0.8×	11 1.4×	13	63
Melissa E. Sanchez United States	5	22 1.0×	21 1.1×	19 1.2×	5 0.6×	5 0.6×	21	60
Claire McEachern United States	4	31 1.3×	34 1.8×	20 1.3×	11 1.4×	6 0.8×	14	73
Ken Jackson United States	5	42 1.8×	25 1.3×	19 1.2×	12 1.5×	13 1.6×	13	81
Ioan Williams	4	46 2.0×	12 0.6×	11 0.7×	9 1.1×	10 1.3×	12	76
Torquato Tasso	5	29 1.3×	21 1.1×	13 0.8×	9 1.1×	6 0.8×	33	80
Sebastián Neumeister Germany	3	30 1.3×	12 0.6×	16 1.0×	3 0.4×	5 0.6×	24	74
Katharine A. Craik United Kingdom	5	21 0.9×	26 1.4×	6 0.4×	11 1.4×	6 0.8×	9	59
Elizabeth Archibald United Kingdom	4	20 0.9×	48 2.5×	16 1.0×	9 1.1×	8 1.0×	20	107
Alexander Balloch Grosart	5	24 1.0×	16 0.8×	10 0.6×	8 1.0×	6 0.8×	17	56

Countries citing papers authored by Greg Kucich

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Greg Kucich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Greg Kucich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Greg Kucich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Greg Kucich

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Greg Kucich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Greg Kucich. The network helps show where Greg Kucich may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Greg Kucich

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Greg Kucich. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Greg Kucich based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Greg Kucich. Greg Kucich is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

14 of 14 papers shown

1.

Kucich, Greg, et al.. (2022). Keats’s Reading / Reading Keats.

2.

Kucich, Greg. (2015). Response. Studies in Romanticism. 54(2). 295–298.

3.

Kucich, Greg, et al.. (2008). Nineteenth-century worlds : global formations past and present.. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 5 indexed citations

4.

Kucich, Greg, et al.. (2007). Introduction: Global Formations and Recalcitrances. Nineteenth Century Contexts. 29(2-3). 73–88. 2 indexed citations

5.

Keymer, Thomas, Michael Scrivener, Saree Makdisi, et al.. (2004). The Cambridge Companion to English Literature, 1740–1830. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 12 indexed citations

6.

Kucich, Greg. (2002). Women's Historiography and the (dis) Embodiment of Law: Ann Yearsley, Mary Hays, Elizabeth Benger. The Wordsworth Circle. 33(1). 3–7. 3 indexed citations

7.

Kucich, Greg. (1999). “The wit in the dungeon”: Leigh Hunt and the insolent politics of cockney coteries. European Romantic Review. 10(1-4). 242–253. 1 indexed citations

8.

Kucich, Greg. (1999). 'The Wit in the Dungeon': Leigh Hunt and the Insolent Politics of Cockney Coteries. Érudit (Université de Montréal). 0–0.

9.

Kucich, Greg. (1997). Romantic Studies: The State of the Art or Scholars in Search of a Period. The Wordsworth Circle. 28(2). 82–84.

10.

Kucich, Greg. (1996). Gendering the Canons of Romanticism: Past and Present. The Wordsworth Circle. 27(2). 95–102. 4 indexed citations

11.

Kucich, Greg. (1994). Inventing Revolutionary History: Romanticism and the Politics of Literary Tradition. The Wordsworth Circle. 25(3). 138–145.

12.

Fulford, Tim & Greg Kucich. (1994). Keats, Shelley, and Romantic Spenserianism. The Modern Language Review. 89(2). 461–461. 13 indexed citations

13.

Kucich, Greg. (1993). Romanticism and Feminist Historiography. The Wordsworth Circle. 24(3). 133–140. 4 indexed citations

14.

Kucich, Greg. (1992). "A Haunted Ruin": Romantic Drama, Renaissance Tradition, and the Critical Establishment. The Wordsworth Circle. 23(2). 64–76. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact