James McLaverty
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Literature: history, themes, analysis 3
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism 1
- Museology top 10%
-
- Historical and Literary Studies 2
-
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 2
-
- Historical Influence and Diplomacy 2
-
- Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics 1
-
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 1
-
- Historical Linguistics and Language Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Pat RogersIan GaddIan HigginsClaude RawsonDavid WomersleyJonathan SwiftHoward D. WeinbrotD. James Nokes
- Journals
- Modern Philology (2 papers)The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America (2 papers)The Modern Language Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
James McLaverty
12 papers receiving 45 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Literature and Literary Theory 51
- Museology 9
- Classics 7
- Music 6
- Anthropology 17
Countries citing papers authored by James McLaverty
This map shows the geographic impact of James McLaverty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James McLaverty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James McLaverty more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James McLaverty
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James McLaverty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James McLaverty. The network helps show where James McLaverty may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 21 scholars most cited alongside James McLaverty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 5 | The Cambridge edition of the works of Jonathan Swift | 2008 | 9 |
| 6 | 2007 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 17 | |
| 9 | 1993 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1986 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1985 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1984 | 10 | |
| 13 | The Mode of Existence of Literary Works of Art: The Case of the Dunciad variorum | 1984 | 18 |
| 14 | 1981 | 0 | |
| 15 | 1981 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1980 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1980 | 2 |
About James McLaverty
James McLaverty is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Music, Anthropology, History and Museology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 95 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (2 papers), Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (1 paper), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (1 paper), Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper) and Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (51 citations), Museology (9 citations), Classics (7 citations), Music (6 citations) and Anthropology (17 citations). James McLaverty has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Pat Rogers, Ian Gadd, Ian Higgins, Claude Rawson, David Womersley, Jonathan Swift, Howard D. Weinbrot, D. James Nokes, Laura Brown and David Fairer. Their work appears in journals such as Modern Philology, The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, The Modern Language Review, Journal of the History of Ideas and The Library.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.