Thomas J. Chermack

3.3k total citations
71 papers, 2.3k citations indexed

About

Thomas J. Chermack is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas J. Chermack has authored 71 papers receiving a total of 2.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 31 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 22 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in Thomas J. Chermack's work include Complex Systems and Decision Making (29 papers), Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (21 papers) and Organizational Learning and Leadership (19 papers). Thomas J. Chermack is often cited by papers focused on Complex Systems and Decision Making (29 papers), Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (21 papers) and Organizational Learning and Leadership (19 papers). Thomas J. Chermack collaborates with scholars based in United States, Singapore and United Kingdom. Thomas J. Chermack's co-authors include Susan A. Lynham, Ji Hoon Song, Baek‐Kyoo Joo, Richard A. Swanson, Kim Nimon, Russell Korte, Wendy E. A. Ruona, Alessandro Fergnani, Larry M. Dooley and George Burt and has published in prestigious journals such as Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Futures and Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies.

In The Last Decade

Thomas J. Chermack

69 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas J. Chermack United States 29 732 626 624 427 253 71 2.3k
Robert Y. Cavana New Zealand 21 694 0.9× 434 0.7× 396 0.6× 406 1.0× 94 0.4× 51 2.3k
David J. Snowden United Kingdom 18 982 1.3× 540 0.9× 308 0.5× 471 1.1× 132 0.5× 26 3.0k
Russ Marion United States 11 680 0.9× 591 0.9× 1.0k 1.7× 297 0.7× 56 0.2× 23 2.6k
Gerald Midgley United Kingdom 33 2.0k 2.7× 318 0.5× 428 0.7× 898 2.1× 292 1.2× 106 3.5k
Rafael Ramírez United Kingdom 22 477 0.7× 1.2k 1.9× 866 1.4× 673 1.6× 234 0.9× 60 3.3k
Maureen Meadows United Kingdom 23 324 0.4× 641 1.0× 384 0.6× 475 1.1× 60 0.2× 75 1.9k
George Cairns United Kingdom 23 801 1.1× 467 0.7× 306 0.5× 532 1.2× 448 1.8× 73 2.3k
Art Kleiner United States 11 403 0.6× 510 0.8× 718 1.2× 213 0.5× 42 0.2× 24 2.0k
Robert L. Flood United Kingdom 24 1.1k 1.5× 201 0.3× 348 0.6× 508 1.2× 135 0.5× 80 2.0k
Leroy White United Kingdom 24 905 1.2× 397 0.6× 342 0.5× 528 1.2× 91 0.4× 75 2.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas J. Chermack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas J. Chermack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas J. Chermack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas J. Chermack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas J. Chermack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas J. Chermack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas J. Chermack. The network helps show where Thomas J. Chermack may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas J. Chermack

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas J. Chermack. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas J. Chermack based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas J. Chermack. Thomas J. Chermack is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fergnani, Alessandro & Thomas J. Chermack. (2021). Toward a science of futures and foresight: Response to 10 experts' commentaries. 3(3-4). 5 indexed citations
2.
Fergnani, Alessandro & Thomas J. Chermack. (2020). The resistance to scientific theory in futures and foresight, and what to do about it. 3(3-4). 37 indexed citations
3.
Chermack, Thomas J., et al.. (2017). The effects of scenario planning on participant reports of resilience. European journal of training and development. 41(4). 306–326. 9 indexed citations
4.
Chermack, Thomas J.. (2017). Foundations of Scenario Planning: The Story of Pierre Wack. CERN Bulletin. 11 indexed citations
5.
Chermack, Thomas J., et al.. (2016). The Effects of Scenario Planning on Participant Decision-Making Style: A Quasi-Experimental Study of Four Companies. Journal of futures studies. 21–40. 4 indexed citations
6.
Chermack, Thomas J., et al.. (2014). The Effects of Scenario Planning on Antecedents to Participant Engagement at Work. Journal of futures studies. 18(4). 77–92. 2 indexed citations
7.
Chermack, Thomas J.. (2011). Scenario Planning in Organizations: How to Create, Use, and Assess Scenarios. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 118 indexed citations
8.
Chermack, Thomas J., et al.. (2011). The development of an instrument for measuring mental model styles with US managers. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning. 7(3). 250–250. 1 indexed citations
9.
Chermack, Thomas J., et al.. (2010). Two Strategies for Leveraging Teams Toward Organizational Effectiveness: Scenario Planning and Organizational Ambidexterity. Advances in Developing Human Resources. 12(1). 137–156. 29 indexed citations
10.
Chermack, Thomas J., et al.. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Integrating deliberate and emergent strategy with scenario planning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 77(2). 193–202. 132 indexed citations
11.
Chermack, Thomas J., et al.. (2008). Game Theory and Strategic Human Resource Development. Advances in Developing Human Resources. 10(6). 834–847. 3 indexed citations
12.
Song, Ji Hoon & Thomas J. Chermack. (2008). Assessing the psychometric properties of the Dimensions of the Learning Organization Questionnaire in the Korean business context. International Journal of Training and Development. 12(2). 87–99. 23 indexed citations
13.
Song, Ji Hoon, et al.. (2008). Cross Cultural Perspectives of the Learning Organization: Assessing the Validity and Reliability of the DLOQ in Korea.. 5 indexed citations
14.
Chermack, Thomas J., et al.. (2006). PROCESS LEVEL SCENARIO PLANNING. Academy of strategic management journal. 5. 115. 3 indexed citations
15.
Chermack, Thomas J., et al.. (2006). Exploring the relationship between scenario planning and perceptions of strategic conversation quality. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 74(3). 379–390. 36 indexed citations
16.
Lynham, Susan A., et al.. (2004). Selecting Organization Development Theory From an HRD Perspective. Human Resource Development Review. 3(2). 151–172. 20 indexed citations
17.
Chermack, Thomas J.. (2004). The opportunities for HRD in scenario planning. Human Resource Development International. 7(1). 117–121. 2 indexed citations
18.
Lynham, Susan A., et al.. (2004). Adult Literacy: Issues and Directions Impacting HRD.. 3 indexed citations
19.
Chermack, Thomas J.. (2003). Decision-Making Expertise at the Core of Human Resource Development. Advances in Developing Human Resources. 5(4). 365–377. 9 indexed citations
20.
Chermack, Thomas J.. (2003). Mental Models in Decision Making and Implications for Human Resource Development. Advances in Developing Human Resources. 5(4). 408–422. 44 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026