Damon Tomlin

3.3k total citations · 2 hit papers
15 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

Damon Tomlin is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Damon Tomlin has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 4 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in Damon Tomlin's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers). Damon Tomlin is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers). Damon Tomlin collaborates with scholars based in United States, Vietnam and Italy. Damon Tomlin's co-authors include P. Read Montague, Brooks King‐Casas, Colin F. Camerer, Steven R. Quartz, P. Read Montague, Jian Li, Samuel M. McClure, M. Amin Kayali, Kenneth T. Kishida and Pearl H. Chiu and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Neuron and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Damon Tomlin

15 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Getting to Know You: Reputation and Trust in a Two-Person Economic Exchange

2005 918 citations Brooks King‐Casas, Damon Tomlin et al. Science profile →
Neural Correlates of Behavioral Preference for Culturally Familiar Drinks

2004 811 citations Samuel M. McClure, Jian Li et al. Neuron profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Damon Tomlin United States	9	1.2k	566	437	349	248	15	2.2k
Ming Hsu United States	26	1.6k 1.3×	523 0.9×	808 1.8×	434 1.2×	287 1.2×	67	2.9k
Terry Lohrenz United States	25	1.3k 1.0×	449 0.8×	476 1.1×	309 0.9×	212 0.9×	50	2.5k
Douglas H. Wedell United States	29	798 0.6×	498 0.9×	527 1.2×	369 1.1×	257 1.0×	90	2.7k
G. Elliott Wimmer United States	18	1.6k 1.3×	305 0.5×	449 1.0×	121 0.3×	73 0.3×	20	2.3k
Sascha Topolinski Germany	32	1.2k 0.9×	1.0k 1.8×	1.3k 3.0×	464 1.3×	69 0.3×	85	2.7k
Matthew J. C. Crump United States	21	1.9k 1.5×	462 0.8×	679 1.6×	328 0.9×	91 0.4×	49	3.0k
Emily Balcetis United States	20	766 0.6×	679 1.2×	404 0.9×	641 1.8×	70 0.3×	65	1.8k
Vinod Venkatraman United States	23	1.4k 1.2×	383 0.7×	615 1.4×	254 0.7×	38 0.2×	58	2.6k
Johannes Hewig Germany	34	2.0k 1.6×	537 0.9×	955 2.2×	348 1.0×	273 1.1×	113	3.1k
Richard J. Tunney United Kingdom	26	656 0.5×	398 0.7×	344 0.8×	307 0.9×	138 0.6×	72	2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Damon Tomlin

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Damon Tomlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Damon Tomlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Damon Tomlin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Damon Tomlin

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Damon Tomlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Damon Tomlin. The network helps show where Damon Tomlin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Damon Tomlin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Damon Tomlin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Damon Tomlin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Damon Tomlin. Damon Tomlin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

15 of 15 papers shown

Tomlin, Damon. (2021). Consensus decision-making: performance of heuristics and mental models. Evolution and Human Behavior. 42(4). 316–330. 5 indexed citations

Tomlin, Damon, et al.. (2017). The integration of social influence and reward: Computational approaches and neural evidence. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience. 17(4). 784–808. 3 indexed citations

Rand, David G., Damon Tomlin, Adam Bear, Elliot A. Ludvig, & Jonathan D. Cohen. (2017). Cyclical population dynamics of automatic versus controlled processing: An evolutionary pendulum.. Psychological Review. 124(5). 626–642. 31 indexed citations

Tomlin, Damon, David G. Rand, Elliot A. Ludvig, & Jonathan D. Cohen. (2015). The evolution and devolution of cognitive control: The costs of deliberation in a competitive world. Scientific Reports. 5(1). 11002–11002. 22 indexed citations

Tomlin, Damon. (2015). Rational Constraints and the Evolution of Fairness in the Ultimatum Game. PLoS ONE. 10(7). e0134636–e0134636. 5 indexed citations

Tomlin, Damon, et al.. (2013). The Neural Substrates of Social Influence on Decision Making. PLoS ONE. 8(1). e52630–e52630. 28 indexed citations

Tomlin, Damon, et al.. (2011). A Decision Task in a Social Context: Human Experiments, Models, and Analyses of Behavioral Data. Proceedings of the IEEE. 100(3). 713–733. 8 indexed citations

Vu, Linh, et al.. (2011). Deterministic Modeling and Evaluation of Decision-Making Dynamics in Sequential Two-Alternative Forced Choice Tasks. Proceedings of the IEEE. 100(3). 734–750. 7 indexed citations

Stewart, Andrew, et al.. (2011). Towards Human–Robot Teams: Model-Based Analysis of Human Decision Making in Two-Alternative Choice Tasks With Social Feedback. Proceedings of the IEEE. 100(3). 751–775. 29 indexed citations

10.

Morgansen, Kristi A., et al.. (2010). Modeling and evaluation of decision-making dynamics in sequential two-alternative forced choice tasks. 1. 3802–3807. 1 indexed citations

11.

Chiu, Pearl H., M. Amin Kayali, Kenneth T. Kishida, et al.. (2008). Self Responses along Cingulate Cortex Reveal Quantitative Neural Phenotype for High-Functioning Autism. Neuron. 57(3). 463–473. 154 indexed citations

12.

Tomlin, Damon, M. Amin Kayali, Brooks King‐Casas, et al.. (2006). Supporting Online Material for Agent-Specific Responses in the Cingulate Cortex During Economic Exchanges. 1 indexed citations

13.

Tomlin, Damon, M. Amin Kayali, Brooks King‐Casas, et al.. (2006). Agent-Specific Responses in the Cingulate Cortex During Economic Exchanges. Science. 312(5776). 1047–1050. 165 indexed citations

14.

King‐Casas, Brooks, et al.. (2005). Getting to Know You: Reputation and Trust in a Two-Person Economic Exchange. Science. 308(5718). 78–83. 918 indexed citations breakdown →

15.

McClure, Samuel M., et al.. (2004). Neural Correlates of Behavioral Preference for Culturally Familiar Drinks. Neuron. 44(2). 379–387. 811 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact