Thomas De Quincey
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Philosophy top 10%
- History top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Anthropology
- Topics
- Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers)Scottish History and National Identity (2 papers)Photographic and Visual Arts (1 paper)
- Journals
- College Composition and CommunicationThe Modern Language ReviewCambridge University Press eBooks
In The Last Decade
Thomas De Quincey
27 papers receiving 64 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Literature and Literary Theory 43
- Philosophy 19
- History 18
- Sociology and Political Science 15
- Anthropology 14
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas De Quincey
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas De Quincey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas De Quincey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas De Quincey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas De Quincey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas De Quincey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas De Quincey. The network helps show where Thomas De Quincey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas De Quincey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas De Quincey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas De Quincey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas De Quincey. Thomas De Quincey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The English mail coach | 1 |
| 2 | Essays in Philosophy | 1 |
| 3 | Confessions of an English opium-eater ; and, related writings | 3 |
| 4 | Essays in Ancient History and Antiquities | 1 |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | Les derniers jours d'Emmanuel Kant | 1 |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | Confesiones de un inglés comedor de opio | 0 |
| 9 | Articles from Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine and Tait's Edinburgh Magazine, 1832-8 | 1 |
| 10 | Del asesinato considerado como una de las bellas artes | 8 |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | Articles and translations from the London Magazine, Walladmor, 1824-1825 | 1 |
| 13 | Les Confessions d'un mangeur d'opium anglais = Suspiria de profundis = La malle-poste analaise | 0 |
| 14 | The posthumous works | 1 |
| 15 | De Quincey as critic | 3 |
| 16 | Reminiscences of the English Lake Poets | 7 |
| 17 | Political economy and politics | 3 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | Confessions of an English opium-eater : in both the revised and the original texts with its sequels ; Suspiria de profundis and ; The English mail-coach | 3 |
| 20 | Confesiones de un comedor de opio inglés | 0 |
About Thomas De Quincey
Thomas De Quincey is a scholar working on Archeology, History and Philosophy of Science and Conservation, having authored 52 papers that have together received 109 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (2 papers) and Photographic and Visual Arts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (43 citations), Museology (7 citations) and History (18 citations). Frequent co-authors include Frederick Burwick, David Masson, Charles Baudelaire, James Hogg, Wilfred Owen and John E. Jordan. Their work appears in journals such as College Composition and Communication, The Modern Language Review and Cambridge University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.