David Fairer
-
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism 2
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism 2
- French Literature and Criticism 1
- Classics top 10%
- History top 5%
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 1
-
- Classical Antiquity Studies 2
-
- Language, Metaphor, and Cognition 1
-
- Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies 1
-
- Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Michael SeidelCarolyn D. WilliamsHoward Erskine‐HillThomas WartonHoward D. WeinbrotPat RogersPatricia Meyer SpacksLaura Brown
- Journals
- The Review of English Studies (4 papers)Essays in Criticism (4 papers)Notes and Queries (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
David Fairer
22 papers receiving 76 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Literature and Literary Theory 75
- Classics 16
- History 42
- Anthropology 24
- Museology 7
Countries citing papers authored by David Fairer
This map shows the geographic impact of David Fairer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Fairer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Fairer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Fairer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Fairer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Fairer. The network helps show where David Fairer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 17 scholars most cited alongside David Fairer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 6 | A Caribbean Georgic: James Grainger's The Sugar-Cane | 2003 | 1 |
| 7 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 2 | |
| 9 | Letters on chivalry and romance | 2001 | 16 |
| 10 | Spenser's Faerie queene : Warton's observations and Hurd's letters | 2001 | 2 |
| 11 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1999 | 3 | |
| 13 | Thomas Warton's history of English poetry | 1998 | 4 |
| 14 | Pope : new contexts | 1990 | 3 |
| 15 | The Poetry of Alexander Pope | 1989 | 1 |
| 16 | 1983 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1982 | 15 | |
| 18 | 1981 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1975 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1975 | 2 |
About David Fairer
David Fairer is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Classics, Anthropology, History and Religious studies, having authored 35 papers that have together received 149 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Contemporary Literature and Criticism (2 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (2 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (2 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper), French Literature and Criticism (1 paper), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (1 paper), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (1 paper) and Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (75 citations), Classics (16 citations), History (42 citations), Anthropology (24 citations) and Museology (7 citations). David Fairer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Seidel, Carolyn D. Williams, Howard Erskine‐Hill, Thomas Warton, Howard D. Weinbrot, Pat Rogers, Patricia Meyer Spacks, Laura Brown, James McLaverty and D. James Nokes. Their work appears in journals such as The Review of English Studies, Essays in Criticism, Notes and Queries, Romanticism and Studies in Romanticism.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.