Todd Kontje
-
- German Literature and Culture Studies 20
- Literature and Cultural Memory 5
- Narrative Theory and Analysis 3
- Cultural Studies top 10%
- History top 10%
-
- Linguistic research and analysis 4
-
- Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies 3
-
- European history and politics 3
-
- German legal, social, and political studies 2
- Central European national history 2
- Co-authors
- Nicholas SaulJohn NeubauerLutz KoepnickNicolas PethesTobias BoesFotis JannidisGerhard LauerAndrew Piper
- Journals
- The Modern Language Review (1 paper)German Studies Review (5 papers)The German Quarterly (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Todd Kontje
18 papers receiving 84 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Literature and Literary Theory 61
- Cultural Studies 16
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 8
- History 17
- Philosophy 16
Countries citing papers authored by Todd Kontje
This map shows the geographic impact of Todd Kontje's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Todd Kontje with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Todd Kontje more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Todd Kontje
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Todd Kontje. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Todd Kontje. The network helps show where Todd Kontje may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Todd Kontje, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 3 | Distant Readings: Topologies of German Culture in the Long Nineteenth Century | 2014 | 9 |
| 4 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 7 | Marlitt's World: Domestic Fiction in an Age of Empire | 2004 | 1 |
| 8 | 2004 | 25 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2000 | 9 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 9 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 0 | |
| 14 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1995 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1994 | 0 | |
| 19 | 1989 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1988 | 1 |
About Todd Kontje
Todd Kontje is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Classics and Language and Linguistics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 138 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include German Literature and Culture Studies (20 papers), Literature and Cultural Memory (5 papers), Linguistic research and analysis (4 papers), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (3 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (3 papers), European history and politics (3 papers), German legal, social, and political studies (2 papers) and Central European national history (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (61 citations), Cultural Studies (16 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (8 citations). Todd Kontje has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas Saul, John Neubauer, Lutz Koepnick, Nicolas Pethes, Tobias Boes, Fotis Jannidis, Gerhard Lauer, Andrew Piper, Mark Algee‐Hewitt and Allen Riddell. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, German Studies Review and The German Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.