James Hogg

1.5k total papers · 710 total citations
39 papers, 229 citations indexed

About

James Hogg is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, James Hogg has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 229 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 4 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in James Hogg's work include Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (3 papers) and International Law and Human Rights (3 papers). James Hogg is often cited by papers focused on Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (3 papers) and International Law and Human Rights (3 papers). James Hogg collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. James Hogg's co-authors include Khalid Al‐Ahmadi, Linda See, Alison Heppenstall, Harold J. McWhinnie, Mark Gahegan, Stuart Roberts, Brian Hoyle, Mitchell Levine, Neil Stuart and David A. Schwartz and has published in prestigious journals such as Computers & Geosciences, Geographical Journal and Information and Software Technology.

In The Last Decade

James Hogg

19 papers receiving 190 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
James Hogg 117 62 28 27 24 39 229
David Retchless 79 0.7× 41 0.7× 35 1.3× 10 0.4× 22 0.9× 22 270
James K. Lein 145 1.2× 24 0.4× 20 0.7× 57 2.1× 18 0.8× 31 299
John N. Rayner 80 0.7× 18 0.3× 48 1.7× 45 1.7× 13 0.5× 19 278
Marcin Kulawiak 48 0.4× 44 0.7× 18 0.6× 14 0.5× 22 0.9× 36 310
Tianlu Qian 83 0.7× 39 0.6× 23 0.8× 46 1.7× 135 5.6× 24 311
John Kiema 60 0.5× 15 0.2× 35 1.3× 54 2.0× 12 0.5× 26 239
Szymon Chmielewski 109 0.9× 45 0.7× 11 0.4× 27 1.0× 36 1.5× 23 295
Tessio Novack 93 0.8× 33 0.5× 46 1.6× 63 2.3× 81 3.4× 27 326
Howard Veregin 52 0.4× 28 0.5× 22 0.8× 44 1.6× 14 0.6× 21 267
Robert Berry 67 0.6× 27 0.4× 5 0.2× 9 0.3× 12 0.5× 29 238

Countries citing papers authored by James Hogg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Hogg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Hogg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Hogg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Hogg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Hogg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Hogg. The network helps show where James Hogg may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Hogg

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Hogg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Hogg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Hogg. James Hogg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026