Thomas Crump

24 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers

Thomas Crump
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Anthropology 55
  • Theoretical Computer Science 6
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 7
  • Sociology and Political Science 141
  • Archeology 3
Replace Richard Ohmann with:
Richard Ohmann United States
A. R. Louch United States
Robert W. Friedrichs United States
Percy S. Cohen United Kingdom
Richard Harker New Zealand
David Nasaw United States
Lisa Jardine United Kingdom
Dennis L. Sepper United States
Louis Marín France
Jean-Claude Chamboredon France
Thomas Crump relative to Richard Ohmann United States Richard Ohmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Richard Ohmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Crump

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Crump's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Crump with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Crump more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Crump

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Crump. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Crump. The network helps show where Thomas Crump may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Crump, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Crump Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Crump links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199088
2 198375
3 197444
4 198239
5 197929
6 197627
7 198621
8 197816
9 197416
10 198211
11 199211
12 19869
13 19927
14 19847
15
The death of an emperor: Japan at the crossroads
19895
16 19884
17
Anthropologie des nombres : savoir-compter, cultures et sociétés
19953
18 19943
19 19922
20
La antropología de los números
19942

About Thomas Crump

Thomas Crump is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence and Cultural Studies, having authored 26 papers that have together received 426 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geography and Education Methods (1 paper), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper), Educational Methods and Psychological Studies (1 paper), Russia and Soviet political economy (1 paper), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (1 paper), Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research (1 paper), Migration, Identity, and Health (1 paper) and Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (55 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (6 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (7 citations), Sociology and Political Science (141 citations) and Archeology (3 citations). Thomas Crump has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include David M. Hayano, Sandra Wallman, William Outhwaite, Jane Collier, Gisèle De Meur, P. S. Atiyah, Ben Orlove, Olivia Harris, John Clammer and Stephen Gudeman. Their work appears in journals such as Current Anthropology, American Ethnologist, American Behavioral Scientist, Human Organization and The American Journal of Comparative Law.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact