This map shows the geographic impact of John Clammer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Clammer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Clammer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Clammer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Clammer. The network helps show where John Clammer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Clammer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Clammer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Clammer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Clammer. John Clammer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Clammer, John, Sylvie Poirier, & Éric Schwimmer. (2004). Figured Worlds. University of Toronto Press eBooks.45 indexed citations
8.
Sillitoe, Paul, Darrell A. Posey, John Clammer, et al.. (2002). Participating in development : approaches to indegenous knowledge. Routledge eBooks.2 indexed citations
Clammer, John, et al.. (1978). Literacy and Social Change.. Pacific Affairs. 51(1). 160–160.3 indexed citations
20.
Clammer, John. (1976). Literacy and social change : a case study of Fiji. E.J. Brill eBooks.14 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.