William Outhwaite

76 papers receiving 992 citations

Peers

William Outhwaite
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Sociology and Political Science 650
  • Political Science and International Relations 193
  • Education 138
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 97
  • Philosophy 92
Replace Gary D. Bouma with:
Gary D. Bouma Australia
Ian Craib United Kingdom
Elizabeth Vallance United States
Larry Ray United Kingdom
Brian Fay United States
Roy Boyne United Kingdom
Gilly Cantor United States
Stjepan G. Meštrović United States
Peter T. Manicas United States
Patrick Baert United Kingdom
William Outhwaite relative to Gary D. Bouma Australia Gary D. Bouma's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gary D. Bouma · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Outhwaite

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Outhwaite's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Outhwaite with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Outhwaite more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Outhwaite

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Outhwaite. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Outhwaite. The network helps show where William Outhwaite may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Outhwaite

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Outhwaite. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Outhwaite based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Outhwaite. William Outhwaite is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 3
3
Habermas global. Wirkungsgeschichte eines Werks
3
4 1
5
Science of science at Sussex University
2
6 6
7
Realism and Consensus
3
8
European Civil Society and the European Intellectual: What Is, and How Does One Become, a European Intellectual?
3
9
Ensiklopedi pemikiran sosial modern
3
10
Defending Objectivity: Essays in Honour of Andrew Collier
13
11
The state (and society) of Europe
3
12 9
13 1
14
A journal of knowledge, culture and policy
7
15 9
16
The Habermas Reader
67
17 13
18 2
19 6
20 17

About William Outhwaite

William Outhwaite is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Urban Studies, having authored 84 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Critical Theory and Philosophy (10 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (8 papers) and Social and Cultural Dynamics (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (650 citations), Public Administration (33 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (97 citations). William Outhwaite has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Turner, Ian Craib, James Farganis, Jürgen Habermas, James L. Heap, Tom Bottomore, Jean-René Tréanton, Thomas Crump, Bryan S. Turner and John Thompson. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, American Journal of Sociology and The Economic Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026