Stewart Goetz

532 total citations
30 papers, 204 citations indexed

About

Stewart Goetz is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Religious studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Stewart Goetz has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 204 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Philosophy, 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 3 papers in Religious studies. Recurrent topics in Stewart Goetz's work include Free Will and Agency (5 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (3 papers) and War, Ethics, and Justification (3 papers). Stewart Goetz is often cited by papers focused on Free Will and Agency (5 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (3 papers) and War, Ethics, and Justification (3 papers). Stewart Goetz collaborates with scholars based in United States, Israel and United Kingdom. Stewart Goetz's co-authors include Craig L. Blomberg, Charles Taliaferro, David Widerker, Matthew Kapstein and Robert Kane and has published in prestigious journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Philosophical Studies and Mind.

In The Last Decade

Stewart Goetz

27 papers receiving 157 citations

Peers

Stewart Goetz

PHILO

CN

ECP

SPS

HPS

Michael Pace United States

Katherin A. Rogers United States

Andrei A. Buckareff United States

Derek Brookes Australia

Bryan Frances United States

Kevin Timpe United States

Andrew Moon United States

G. F. Schueler United States

Michael J. Almeida United States

David M. Ciocchi United States

Michael Pace United States

Stewart Goetz

105 ×0.8

PHILO

77 ×0.8

CN

51 ×1.2

ECP

43 ×1.7

SPS

17 ×0.8

HPS

Citations per year, relative to Stewart Goetz Stewart Goetz (= 1×) peers Michael Pace

Countries citing papers authored by Stewart Goetz

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stewart Goetz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stewart Goetz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stewart Goetz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stewart Goetz

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stewart Goetz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stewart Goetz. The network helps show where Stewart Goetz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stewart Goetz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stewart Goetz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stewart Goetz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stewart Goetz. Stewart Goetz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Goetz, Stewart. (2025). C. S. Lewis on the Soul, God, and Christianity. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 4 indexed citations

2.

Goetz, Stewart. (2022). Some Musings about William Hasker’s Philosophy of Mind. Roczniki Filozoficzne. 70(1). 37–48. 1 indexed citations

3.

Goetz, Stewart, et al.. (2020). What is this thing called the meaning of life?.

4.

Goetz, Stewart. (2016). In Defense of Supernatural Purpose Theory. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion. 8(2). 35–45.

5.

Goetz, Stewart, et al.. (2014). Contemporary Philosophical Naturalism and Its Implications. Philosophia Christi. 16(1). 219–222. 19 indexed citations

6.

Widerker, David & Stewart Goetz. (2013). Fischer against the dilemma defence: the defence prevails. Analysis. 73(2). 283–295. 6 indexed citations

7.

Goetz, Stewart, et al.. (2013). The Argument from Reason. Philosophia Christi. 15(1). 47–62. 2 indexed citations

8.

Goetz, Stewart, et al.. (2012). Is N. T. Wright Right about Substance Dualism?. Philosophia Christi. 14(1). 183–191. 2 indexed citations

9.

Goetz, Stewart. (2011). Freedom, Teleology, and Evil. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 9 indexed citations

10.

Goetz, Stewart, et al.. (2003). A Theodicy. Philosophia Christi. 5(2). 459–484. 1 indexed citations

11.

Goetz, Stewart, et al.. (2002). Persons & Causes. Faith and Philosophy. 19(1). 116–120. 1 indexed citations

12.

Goetz, Stewart. (2002). Alternative Frankfurt‐Style Counterexamples to the Principle of Alternative Possibilities. Pacific philosophical quarterly. 83(2). 131–147. 7 indexed citations

13.

Goetz, Stewart & Robert Kane. (2000). Excerpts from Robert Kane's Discussion with Members of the Audience. The Journal of Ethics. 4(4). 1 indexed citations

14.

Goetz, Stewart, et al.. (2000). Questions about Emergent Dualism. Philosophia Christi. 2(2). 175–181. 1 indexed citations

15.

Goetz, Stewart, et al.. (1999). Whatever Happened to the Soul?. Philosophia Christi. 1(2). 126–128. 11 indexed citations

16.

Goetz, Stewart. (1998). Reasons for forming an intention: a reply to Pink. Mind. 107(425). 205–213. 7 indexed citations

17.

Goetz, Stewart, et al.. (1997). Libertarian Choice. Faith and Philosophy. 14(2). 195–211. 6 indexed citations

18.

Goetz, Stewart. (1995). The choice-intention principle. American Philosophical Quarterly. 32(2). 177–185. 4 indexed citations

19.

Goetz, Stewart, et al.. (1989). Craig’s Kalam Cosmological Argument. Faith and Philosophy. 6(1). 99–102. 3 indexed citations

20.

Goetz, Stewart. (1983). Belief in God is not properly basic. Religious Studies. 19(4). 475–484. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact