Andrew Moon

476 total citations
15 papers, 175 citations indexed

About

Andrew Moon is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Moon has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 175 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Philosophy, 11 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Andrew Moon's work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (14 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (7 papers) and Free Will and Agency (5 papers). Andrew Moon is often cited by papers focused on Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (14 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (7 papers) and Free Will and Agency (5 papers). Andrew Moon collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Andrew Moon's co-authors include Elizabeth Jackson and has published in prestigious journals such as Synthese, Philosophical Studies and Philosophy Compass.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Moon

14 papers receiving 163 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Andrew Moon United States	9	163	75	64	24	19	15	175
Lisa Miracchi United States	6	120 0.7×	65 0.9×	75 1.2×	28 1.2×	19 1.0×	13	160
Marc A. Moffett United States	5	158 1.0×	58 0.8×	114 1.8×	21 0.9×	39 2.1×	11	193
Thomas Grundmann Germany	8	154 0.9×	68 0.9×	66 1.0×	45 1.9×	34 1.8×	33	195
Bryan Frances United States	8	140 0.9×	57 0.8×	85 1.3×	20 0.8×	31 1.6×	30	168
Guy Longworth United Kingdom	7	134 0.8×	53 0.7×	92 1.4×	28 1.2×	22 1.2×	25	184
David Sosa United States	8	113 0.7×	65 0.9×	79 1.2×	12 0.5×	45 2.4×	25	183
Adam Leite United States	9	226 1.4×	105 1.4×	129 2.0×	56 2.3×	19 1.0×	27	258
Adrian Haddock United Kingdom	7	243 1.5×	110 1.5×	157 2.5×	45 1.9×	51 2.7×	14	287
Laura Schroeter Australia	10	188 1.2×	71 0.9×	165 2.6×	23 1.0×	61 3.2×	29	256
Emanuel Viebahn Germany	9	161 1.0×	74 1.0×	104 1.6×	38 1.6×	12 0.6×	21	224

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Moon

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Moon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Moon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Moon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Moon

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Moon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Moon. The network helps show where Andrew Moon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Moon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Moon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Moon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Moon. Andrew Moon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

15 of 15 papers shown

1.

Moon, Andrew & Elizabeth Jackson. (2020). Credence: A Belief-First Approach. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 50(5). 652–669. 18 indexed citations

2.

Moon, Andrew. (2020). Circular and question-begging responses to religious disagreement and debunking arguments. Philosophical Studies. 178(3). 785–809. 9 indexed citations

3.

Moon, Andrew. (2018). A new puzzle about belief and credence. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 49(2). 272–291. 6 indexed citations

4.

Moon, Andrew. (2018). How to Use Cognitive Faculties You Never Knew You Had. Pacific philosophical quarterly. 99(S1). 251–275. 8 indexed citations

5.

Moon, Andrew. (2017). Beliefs do not come in degrees. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 47(6). 760–778. 26 indexed citations

6.

Moon, Andrew. (2017). The nature of doubt and a new puzzle about belief, doubt, and confidence. Synthese. 195(4). 1827–1848. 29 indexed citations

7.

Moon, Andrew, et al.. (2017). Plantinga’s Religious Epistemology, Skeptical Theism, and Debunking Arguments. Faith and Philosophy. 34(4). 449–470. 6 indexed citations

8.

Moon, Andrew. (2016). Recent work in reformed epistemology. Philosophy Compass. 11(12). 879–891. 12 indexed citations

9.

Moon, Andrew. (2016). Debunking Morality: Lessons from the EAAN Literature. Pacific philosophical quarterly. 98(S1). 208–226. 11 indexed citations

10.

Moon, Andrew. (2016). INDEPENDENCE AND NEW WAYS TO REMAIN STEADFAST IN THE FACE OF DISAGREEMENT. Episteme. 15(1). 65–79. 8 indexed citations

11.

Moon, Andrew, et al.. (2015). In defense of proper functionalism: cognitive science takes on Swampman. Synthese. 193(9). 2987–3001. 8 indexed citations

12.

Moon, Andrew. (2014). The New Evil Demon, a Frankfurt-style Counterfactual Intervener, and a Subject’s Perspective Objection: Reply to McCain. Acta Analytica. 30(1). 107–116.

13.

Moon, Andrew. (2012). THREE FORMS OF INTERNALISM AND THE NEW EVIL DEMON PROBLEM. Episteme. 9(4). 345–360. 9 indexed citations

14.

Moon, Andrew. (2012). Remembering entails knowing. Synthese. 190(14). 2717–2729. 16 indexed citations

15.

Moon, Andrew. (2010). Warrant does entail truth. Synthese. 184(3). 287–297. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact