Michael J. Almeida

102 total papers · 401 total citations
30 papers, 161 citations indexed

About

Michael J. Almeida is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael J. Almeida has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 161 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Philosophy, 7 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 5 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Michael J. Almeida's work include Theology and Philosophy of Evil (18 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers). Michael J. Almeida is often cited by papers focused on Theology and Philosophy of Evil (18 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers). Michael J. Almeida collaborates with scholars based in United States and Australia. Michael J. Almeida's co-authors include Graham Oppy, David A. Zubin, Mary Galbraith, William J. Rapaport, Stuart C. Shapiro, Janyce Wiebe, Erwin M. Segal and Judith Felson Duchan and has published in prestigious journals such as Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Philosophy Compass and Erkenntnis.

In The Last Decade

Michael J. Almeida

25 papers receiving 134 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Michael J. Almeida 144 49 47 44 13 30 161
Nick Trakakis 161 1.1× 61 1.2× 54 1.1× 23 0.5× 29 2.2× 47 195
Andrew Moon 163 1.1× 75 1.5× 16 0.3× 64 1.5× 23 1.8× 15 175
Katherin A. Rogers 238 1.7× 57 1.2× 22 0.5× 74 1.7× 25 1.9× 44 281
Stewart Goetz 135 0.9× 98 2.0× 14 0.3× 42 1.0× 25 1.9× 30 204
Saulius Geniušas 65 0.5× 28 0.6× 22 0.5× 69 1.6× 21 1.6× 37 159
Jeff Jordan 143 1.0× 77 1.6× 45 1.0× 28 0.6× 34 2.6× 36 220
Neil Sinhababu 187 1.3× 135 2.8× 35 0.7× 58 1.3× 28 2.2× 26 268
Nelson Pike 237 1.6× 55 1.1× 21 0.4× 78 1.8× 23 1.8× 20 285
Steven Luper 85 0.6× 61 1.2× 16 0.3× 40 0.9× 20 1.5× 27 150
Wes Morriston 151 1.0× 36 0.7× 23 0.5× 39 0.9× 9 0.7× 28 181

Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Almeida

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Almeida's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Almeida with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Almeida more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Almeida

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Almeida. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Almeida. The network helps show where Michael J. Almeida may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael J. Almeida

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael J. Almeida. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael J. Almeida based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael J. Almeida. Michael J. Almeida is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026