Michael J. Almeida
- Philosophy top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Social Psychology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Graham OppyWilliam J. RapaportStuart C. ShapiroJudith Felson DuchanJanyce WiebeMary GalbraithErwin M. SegalDavid A. Zubin
- Topics
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil (18 papers)Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Michael J. Almeida
25 papers receiving 134 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Philosophy 143
- Cognitive Neuroscience 48
- Social Psychology 47
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 44
- Sociology and Political Science 13
Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Almeida
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Almeida's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Almeida with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Almeida more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Almeida
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Almeida. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Almeida. The network helps show where Michael J. Almeida may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael J. Almeida
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael J. Almeida. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael J. Almeida based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael J. Almeida. Michael J. Almeida is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, 2nd Edition | 17 |
| 9 | Chance, Epistemic Probability and Saving Lives: Reply to Bradley | 0 |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | A middle school case study on principal behaviors effecting change in school culture | 0 |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 35 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Michael J. Almeida
Michael J. Almeida is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 161 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theology and Philosophy of Evil (18 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (143 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (44 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (48 citations). Michael J. Almeida has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Graham Oppy, William J. Rapaport, Stuart C. Shapiro, Judith Felson Duchan, Janyce Wiebe, Mary Galbraith, Erwin M. Segal and David A. Zubin. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Philosophy Compass and Erkenntnis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.