Nelson Pike

857 citations
20 papers · 286 indexed · h-index 9
Topics
Theology and Philosophy of Evil (9 papers)Medieval Philosophy and Theology (3 papers)War, Ethics, and Justification (3 papers)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

Nelson Pike

19 papers receiving 215 citations

Peers

Nelson Pike
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • Philosophy 237
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 78
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 55
  • Sociology and Political Science 23
  • Religious studies 22
Replace Frances Howard‐Snyder with:
Frances Howard‐Snyder United States
Katherin A. Rogers United States
Edward Wierenga United States
Stewart Goetz United States
C. K. Grant United Kingdom
Stephen J. Wykstra United States
Michael J. Almeida United States
Andrei A. Buckareff United States
Michael Pace United States
G. F. Schueler United States
Nelson Pike relative to Frances Howard‐Snyder United States Frances Howard‐Snyder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Frances Howard‐Snyder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nelson Pike

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nelson Pike's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nelson Pike with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nelson Pike more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nelson Pike

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nelson Pike. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nelson Pike. The network helps show where Nelson Pike may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nelson Pike

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nelson Pike. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nelson Pike based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nelson Pike. Nelson Pike is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 8
3 2
4 2
5 4
6 1
7 7
8 20
9 31
10 1
11
Omnipotence and God's Ability to Sin
43
12
Religious Symbols and God;: A Philosophical Study of Tillich's Theology
8
13
Hume's Bundle Theory of the Self: A Limited Defense
19
14 3
15 20
16 77
17 4
18 26
19 7
20 2

About Nelson Pike

Nelson Pike is a scholar working on Philosophy, Religious studies and History, having authored 20 papers that have together received 286 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theology and Philosophy of Evil (9 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (3 papers) and War, Ethics, and Justification (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (237 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (78 citations) and Religious studies (22 citations). Nelson Pike has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William L. Rowe, Charles Hartshorne, Ronald E. Santoni and Stewart Sutherland. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026