Matthew Kapstein

28 papers receiving 212 citations

Peers

Matthew Kapstein
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Religious studies 136
  • Philosophy 80
  • Anthropology 68
  • Sociology and Political Science 146
  • Geography, Planning and Development 15
Replace Paul J. Griffiths with:
Paul J. Griffiths United States
David Kinsley Canada
Alex Wayman United States
Janet Gyatso United States
David L. McMahan United States
Klaus K. Klostermaier Canada
Kallistos Ware United Kingdom
June McDaniel United States
Robert E. Buswell United States
Kocku von Stuckrad Brazil
Matthew Kapstein relative to Paul J. Griffiths United States Paul J. Griffiths's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Paul J. Griffiths · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Kapstein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Kapstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Kapstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Kapstein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Kapstein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Kapstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Kapstein. The network helps show where Matthew Kapstein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Kapstein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Kapstein Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Kapstein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200051
2 200446
3 198637
4
The presence of light : divine radiance and religious experience
200434
5 200032
6
Buddhism between Tibet and China
200912
7
Sources of Tibetan tradition
201312
8 202111
9
Soundings in Tibetan Civilization
200811
10 19998
11 19867
12 19894
13 20134
14 20103
15 19863
16 19883
17
New studies of the old Tibetan documents : philology, history and religion
20112
18 19882
19 20142
20 20172

About Matthew Kapstein

Matthew Kapstein is a scholar working on Religious studies, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Philosophy and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 37 papers that have together received 300 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indian and Buddhist Studies (26 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (14 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (11 papers), Indian History and Philosophy (5 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (5 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (4 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (3 papers) and Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (136 citations), Philosophy (80 citations), Anthropology (68 citations), Sociology and Political Science (146 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (15 citations). Matthew Kapstein has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Mark Siderits, Jeffrey Hopkins, Charles Taliaferro, Stewart Goetz, Melvyn C. Goldstein, Derek Parfit, Steven Collins and Robert Α. F. Thurman. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Religion, Philosophy East and West, Journal of Indian Philosophy, History of Religions and Journal of the American Academy of Religion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact