Derek Brookes

752 total citations
11 papers, 210 citations indexed

About

Derek Brookes is a scholar working on Philosophy, Demography and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Derek Brookes has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 210 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Philosophy, 2 papers in Demography and 1 paper in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Derek Brookes's work include Elder Abuse and Neglect (2 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (1 paper) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (1 paper). Derek Brookes is often cited by papers focused on Elder Abuse and Neglect (2 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (1 paper) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (1 paper). Derek Brookes collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Derek Brookes's co-authors include Thomas Reid, Knud Haakonssen, Elsa J. Glanville, A. N. Thompson, Mieghan Bruce, Serina Hancock, Angus Campbell, Amy Lockwood, Ryan O’Handley and Caroline Jacobson and has published in prestigious journals such as Australian Veterinary Journal, International Journal of Applied Philosophy and Choice Reviews Online.

In The Last Decade

Derek Brookes

10 papers receiving 189 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Derek Brookes Australia	5	110	65	49	48	34	11	210
Carol Rovane United States	8	113 1.0×	73 1.1×	77 1.6×	17 0.4×	29 0.9×	18	196
Aaron Z. Zimmerman United States	9	156 1.4×	85 1.3×	78 1.6×	41 0.9×	56 1.6×	17	235
Bjørn Torgrim Ramberg Norway	5	155 1.4×	161 2.5×	85 1.7×	63 1.3×	21 0.6×	19	264
Logi Gunnarsson Germany	7	105 1.0×	45 0.7×	39 0.8×	10 0.2×	41 1.2×	17	170
Jonardon Ganeri United Kingdom	9	159 1.4×	70 1.1×	51 1.0×	32 0.7×	55 1.6×	34	292
Alice Crary United States	8	200 1.8×	87 1.3×	37 0.8×	20 0.4×	50 1.5×	28	280
Guy Axtell United States	7	179 1.6×	48 0.7×	91 1.9×	17 0.4×	74 2.2×	30	234
John StuartHG Mill	5	74 0.7×	44 0.7×	34 0.7×	40 0.8×	35 1.0×	7	231
Laura Schroeter Australia	10	188 1.7×	165 2.5×	71 1.4×	61 1.3×	23 0.7×	29	256
Richard Rojcewicz United States	7	98 0.9×	77 1.2×	29 0.6×	9 0.2×	50 1.5×	17	179

Countries citing papers authored by Derek Brookes

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Derek Brookes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Derek Brookes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Derek Brookes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Derek Brookes

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Derek Brookes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Derek Brookes. The network helps show where Derek Brookes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Derek Brookes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Derek Brookes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Derek Brookes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Derek Brookes. Derek Brookes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Bruce, Mieghan, Elsa J. Glanville, Angus Campbell, et al.. (2022). Seropositivity to Campylobacter and association with abortion and lamb mortality in maiden ewes from Western Australia, South Australia and Victoria. Australian Veterinary Journal. 100(8). 397–406. 2 indexed citations

2.

Brookes, Derek. (2021). Forgiveness as Conditional: A Reply to Kleinig. International Journal of Applied Philosophy. 35(1). 117–125. 1 indexed citations

3.

Brookes, Derek. (2019). Restorative Justice and Domestic Violence. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations

4.

Brookes, Derek. (2009). Restorative Justice and Work-Related Death: Consultation Report. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

5.

Brookes, Derek. (2008). Restorative Justice and Work-Related Death: Literature Review. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations

6.

Reid, Thomas, Derek Brookes, & Knud Haakonssen. (2002). Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man a Critical Edition. 7 indexed citations

7.

Reid, Thomas, Derek Brookes, & Knud Haakonssen. (2002). Thomas Reid - Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Edinburgh University Press eBooks. 58 indexed citations

8.

Reid, Thomas & Derek Brookes. (2000). An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense: A Critical Edition. 14 indexed citations

9.

Brookes, Derek. (1998). Thomas Reid, an inquiry into the human mind: on the principles of common sense: a critical edition. Choice Reviews Online. 36(1). 36–256.

10.

Brookes, Derek. (1998). Evaluating Restorative Justice Programs. Humanity & Society. 22(1). 23–37. 13 indexed citations

11.

Reid, Thomas & Derek Brookes. (1997). An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense. Edinburgh University Press eBooks. 107 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact