Katherin A. Rogers
- Philosophy top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Religious studies top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Durant DrakeRalph Barton PerryArthur O. LovejoyJames Bissett PrattRoy Wood SellarsGeorge SantayanaJeffrey GreenStephen T. Davis
- Topics
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil (27 papers)Medieval Philosophy and Theology (6 papers)Augustinian Studies and Theology (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Katherin A. Rogers
40 papers receiving 227 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Philosophy 238
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 74
- Cognitive Neuroscience 57
- Religious studies 31
- Sociology and Political Science 24
Countries citing papers authored by Katherin A. Rogers
This map shows the geographic impact of Katherin A. Rogers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katherin A. Rogers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katherin A. Rogers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Katherin A. Rogers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katherin A. Rogers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katherin A. Rogers. The network helps show where Katherin A. Rogers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katherin A. Rogers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katherin A. Rogers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katherin A. Rogers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Katherin A. Rogers. Katherin A. Rogers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | The Neoplatonic Metaphysics and Epistemology of Anselm of Canterbury | 8 |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | Personhood, potentiality, and the temporarily comatose patient. | 5 |
About Katherin A. Rogers
Katherin A. Rogers is a scholar working on Philosophy, Religious studies and Archeology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 280 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theology and Philosophy of Evil (27 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (6 papers) and Augustinian Studies and Theology (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (238 citations), Religious studies (31 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (74 citations). Katherin A. Rogers has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Durant Drake, Ralph Barton Perry, Arthur O. Lovejoy, James Bissett Pratt, Roy Wood Sellars, George Santayana, Jeffrey Green, Stephen T. Davis, Charles Taliaferro and Gordon Graham. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy, International Philosophical Quarterly and Social Theory and Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.