Steven H. Day
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Mimi V. ChapmanWilliam J. HallTainayah ThomasEugenia EngTamera Coyne‐BeasleyYesenia MerinoKent M. LeeMark W. Fräser
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (8 papers)Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (7 papers)Social Work Education and Practice (4 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical PsychologyAmerican Journal of Public HealthSocial Science & Medicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaRussia
In The Last Decade
Steven H. Day
23 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
- Clinical Psychology 803
- Sociology and Political Science 714
- General Health Professions 666
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 385
- Social Psychology 360
Countries citing papers authored by Steven H. Day
This map shows the geographic impact of Steven H. Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven H. Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven H. Day more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Steven H. Day
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven H. Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven H. Day. The network helps show where Steven H. Day may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven H. Day
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven H. Day. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven H. Day based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven H. Day. Steven H. Day is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 47 | |
| 7 | 81 | |
| 8 | Implicit Racial/Ethnic Bias Among Health Care Professionals and Its Influence on Health Care Outcomes: A Systematic Reviewbreakdown → | 1458 |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 57 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 167 | |
| 16 | 28 | |
| 17 | 86 | |
| 18 | 120 | |
| 19 | 44 | |
| 20 | 40 |
About Steven H. Day
Steven H. Day is a scholar working on Public Administration, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (8 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (7 papers) and Social Work Education and Practice (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (803 citations), General Health Professions (666 citations) and Family Practice (45 citations). Steven H. Day has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Mimi V. Chapman, William J. Hall, Tainayah Thomas, Eugenia Eng, Tamera Coyne‐Beasley, Yesenia Merino, Kent M. Lee, Mark W. Fräser, B. Keith Payne and Craig S. Schwalbe. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, American Journal of Public Health and Social Science & Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.