Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models.
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Bennett
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Bennett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Bennett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Bennett more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Bennett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Bennett. The network helps show where Nathan Bennett may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan Bennett
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan Bennett.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan Bennett based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan Bennett. Nathan Bennett is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Villasante, Sebastián, Lynne Shannon, Sandra Waddock, et al.. (2025). The human right to a safe climate. Nature Sustainability. 8(12). 1423–1424.
Bennett, Nathan, Rocío López de la Lama, Philippe Le Billon, Irmak Ertör, & Elisa Morgera. (2023). Ocean defenders and human rights. Frontiers in Marine Science. 9.8 indexed citations
Dawson, Neil, Brendan Coolsaet, Eleanor J. Sterling, et al.. (2021). The role of Indigenous peoples and local communities in effective and equitable conservation. Ecology and Society. 26(3).329 indexed citations breakdown →
Bennett, Nathan & Raynald Harvey Lemelin. (2010). A critical analysis of Ontario’s resource-based tourism policy. UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria). 5(1). 21–35.2 indexed citations
15.
Kidwell, Roland E., Nathan Bennett, & Sean Valentine. (2010). The Limits of Effort in Understanding Performance: What Employees "Do" and What Might Be Done about It. The Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship. 15(1). 3.1 indexed citations
16.
Kidwell, Roland E. & Nathan Bennett. (2001). Perceived Work Context and Employee Job Neglect. SSRN Electronic Journal.11 indexed citations
17.
Martin, Christopher & Nathan Bennett. (1996). The Role of Justice Judgements in Explaining the Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment. SSRN Electronic Journal.12 indexed citations
18.
Castrogiovanni, Gary J., Nathan Bennett, & James G. Combs. (1995). Franchisor Types: Reexamination and Clarification. Journal of Small Business Management. 33(1). 45.19 indexed citations
19.
Bennett, Nathan, Christopher Martin, Robert J. Bies, & Joel Brockner. (1995). Coping with a Layoff: A Longitudinal Study of Victims. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
20.
Bennett, Nathan, David M. Herold, & Susan J. Ashford. (1990). The Effects of Tolerance for Ambiguity on Feedback Seeking Behavior. SSRN Electronic Journal.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.