Chris Swoyer

1.4k citations
24 papers · 576 indexed · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Chris Swoyer

22 papers receiving 502 citations

Peers

Chris Swoyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • History and Philosophy of Science 280
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 280
  • Philosophy 209
  • Theoretical Computer Science 14
  • General Psychology 7
Replace Stephen Leeds with:
Stephen Leeds United States
Robert Pargetter Australia
C. A. Hooker Australia
Michael J. Loux United States
C. A. Hooker Canada
J. A. Cover United States
Robin Le Poidevin United Kingdom
Jack Kaminsky United States
Ahti‐Veikko Pietarinen Estonia
George Berkeley Australia
Chris Swoyer relative to Stephen Leeds United States Stephen Leeds's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Stephen Leeds · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chris Swoyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chris Swoyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris Swoyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris Swoyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chris Swoyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris Swoyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris Swoyer. The network helps show where Chris Swoyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Chris Swoyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chris Swoyer Line = papers co-authored together Chris Swoyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20111
2
Critical Reasoning: A User's Manual
20021
3 20018
4 200128
5 199917
6 19985
7 19987
8 19971
9 19957
10 19952
11 19936
12 199379
13 1991195
14 19881
15 19834
16 19837
17 1982148
18 198113
19 19770
20 19756

About Chris Swoyer

Chris Swoyer is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, History and Philosophy of Science, General Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 24 papers that have together received 576 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (2 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (2 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (1 paper) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (280 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (280 citations), Philosophy (209 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (14 citations) and General Psychology (7 citations). Chris Swoyer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Edward N. Zalta, David E. Over, Douglas Walton, Robert W. Shahan, Thomas C. Monson, Jack L. Knetsch, Eldar Shafir, Sharon Dunwoody, Anthony Patt and Robert J. MacCoun. Their work appears in journals such as Noûs, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Synthese, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Journal of the history of philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026