Richard Healey

37 papers receiving 720 citations

Peers

Richard Healey
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • History and Philosophy of Science 405
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 562
  • Theoretical Computer Science 17
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 149
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 140
Replace Miklós Rédei with:
Miklós Rédei Hungary
Wayne C. Myrvold Canada
Alisa Bokulich United States
Simon Saunders United Kingdom
Gordon Belot United States
Craig Callender United States
Jeffrey Bub United States
Lawrence Sklar United States
Michaël Esfeld Switzerland
James T. Cushing United States
Richard Healey relative to Miklós Rédei Hungary Miklós Rédei's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Miklós Rédei · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Healey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Healey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Healey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Healey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Healey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Healey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Healey. The network helps show where Richard Healey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Richard Healey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Healey Line = papers co-authored together Richard Healey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 201741
3 20156
4 201311
5 20125
6 200778
7 20046
8 200124
9 199912
10
Quantum Measurement: Beyond Paradox
199820
11 199740
12 19962
13 199515
14 19939
15 19926
16 199232
17 199186
18 199181
19 198420
20
Reduction, Time and Reality: Studies in the Philosophy of the Natural Sciences
198121

About Richard Healey

Richard Healey is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Theoretical Computer Science, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 39 papers that have together received 841 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Mechanics and Applications (24 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (15 papers), Biofield Effects and Biophysics (6 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (5 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (5 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (4 papers), History and advancements in chemistry (2 papers) and Origins and Evolution of Life (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (405 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (562 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (17 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (149 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (140 citations). Richard Healey has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Horwich, Jeremy Butterfield, Geoffrey Hellman, R. I. G. Hughes, Malcolm Keene, J. M. Graham, Mark Bridger, Stephen Leeds and David S. Park. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of Science, The Philosophical Review, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics and Synthese.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026