Michael Tooley

3.2k citations
42 papers · 850 indexed · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Tooley

36 papers receiving 713 citations

Peers

Michael Tooley
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • History and Philosophy of Science 340
  • Philosophy 450
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 399
  • Theoretical Computer Science 14
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 123
Replace David S. Oderberg with:
David S. Oderberg United Kingdom
Trenton Merricks United States
Robert Pargetter Australia
Michael J. Loux United States
Quentin Smith United States
Kristie Miller Australia
Robert Merrihew Adams United States
Jonathan Bennett United States
Hud Hudson United States
Alexander R. Pruss United States
Michael Tooley relative to David S. Oderberg United Kingdom David S. Oderberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
David S. Oderberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Tooley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Tooley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Tooley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Tooley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Tooley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Tooley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Tooley. The network helps show where Michael Tooley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Tooley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Tooley Line = papers co-authored together Michael Tooley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1977262
2 1999146
3 198591
4 199153
5 198843
6 200828
7 199027
8
Knowledge of God
200825
9 201921
10 199119
11 199015
12
Abortion: Three Perspectives
200914
13 200313
14 201413
15 19989
16 19909
17 19897
18 19816
19 19806
20 19766

About Michael Tooley

Michael Tooley is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 850 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (11 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (10 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (7 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (3 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (3 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers) and Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (340 citations), Philosophy (450 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (399 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (14 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (123 citations). Michael Tooley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Quentin R. Smith, Nancy Davis, Alvin Plantinga, Evan Fales, E. J. Lowe, Galen Strawson, Philip E. Devine, Alison M. Jaggar, Michael Wreen and Matthew Hanser. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Noûs, Australasian Journal of Philosophy and Faith and Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact