Stephen G. Post

123 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Stephen G. Post
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
  • Health 662
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 91
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 564
  • Aging 62
  • Clinical Psychology 689
Replace Jayne Lucke with:
Jayne Lucke Australia
Dana A. Glei United States
Keith E. Whitfield United States
Richard A. Miech United States
Louise Lafortune United Kingdom
Man‐Kit Lei United States
Benjamin P. Chapman United States
Peggye Dilworth‐Anderson United States
Christian Hakulinen Finland
Donald A. Lloyd United States
Stephen G. Post relative to Jayne Lucke Australia Jayne Lucke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Jayne Lucke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen G. Post

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen G. Post's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen G. Post with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen G. Post more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen G. Post

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen G. Post. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen G. Post. The network helps show where Stephen G. Post may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen G. Post, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen G. Post Line = papers co-authored together Stephen G. Post links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 129 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005468
2 1992335
3 2000299
4 2002110
5 1995104
6 200487
7 200373
8 199770
9 200064
10 201457
11 201953
12 201346
13 201143
14 200343
15 200338
16 200138
17 201536
18 199436
19 199834
20 201433

About Stephen G. Post

Stephen G. Post is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental health, Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 129 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (21 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (20 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (11 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (10 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (9 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (8 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (8 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (662 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (91 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (564 citations), Aging (62 citations) and Clinical Psychology (689 citations). Stephen G. Post has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Peter J. Whitehouse, Christina M. Puchalski, David B. Larson, Maria E. Pagano, Robert H. Binstock, Matthew T. Lee, Jeffrey P. Schloss, Lynn G. Underwood, William B. Hurlbut and Shannon M. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, The Hastings Center Report, JAMA, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society and Journal of Religious Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact