Mark Schweda

55 papers receiving 635 citations

Peers

Mark Schweda
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 52
  • Health Informatics 17
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 272
  • General Health Professions 209
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 86
Replace Kate Weiner with:
Kate Weiner United Kingdom
Warren T. Reich United States
Elisabeth O. Burgess United States
Fleur Thomése Netherlands
Julie Erickson United States
Mirian Agus Italy
Meika Loe United States
Leslie Hasche United States
Michael A. Garcia United States
Rosa Marina Afonso Portugal
Mark Schweda relative to Kate Weiner United Kingdom Kate Weiner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.7×
Kate Weiner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Schweda

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Schweda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Schweda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Schweda more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Schweda

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Schweda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Schweda. The network helps show where Mark Schweda may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Schweda, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Schweda Line = papers co-authored together Mark Schweda links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201163
2 201736
3 201836
4 201433
5 201933
6 201833
7 200732
8 200932
9 201927
10 201126
11 200924
12 202123
13 201823
14 202121
15 202120
16 201816
17 200915
18 200912
19 202311
20 202011

About Mark Schweda

Mark Schweda is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 65 papers that have together received 659 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers), Ethics in medical practice (9 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (9 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (8 papers), Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (7 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (6 papers), Health and Medical Studies (5 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (52 citations), Health Informatics (17 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (272 citations), General Health Professions (209 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (86 citations). Mark Schweda has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Silke Schicktanz, Larissa Pfaller, Brian Wynne, Karin Jongsma, Claudia Bozzaro, Joachim Boldt, Martina Franzen, Aviad E. Raz, Anita Silvers and Alexander E. Urban. Their work appears in journals such as Medicine Health Care and Philosophy, Bioethics, Frontiers in Psychiatry, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine and Social Science & Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact