Mark Schweda

1.3k total citations
65 papers, 659 citations indexed

About

Mark Schweda is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Schweda has authored 65 papers receiving a total of 659 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in General Health Professions, 23 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 10 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Mark Schweda's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (9 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (9 papers). Mark Schweda is often cited by papers focused on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (9 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (9 papers). Mark Schweda collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Mark Schweda's co-authors include Silke Schicktanz, Larissa Pfaller, Brian Wynne, Karin Jongsma, Claudia Bozzaro, Martina Franzen, Joachim Boldt, Anita Silvers, Aviad E. Raz and Alexander E. Urban and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Social Science & Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Mark Schweda

55 papers receiving 635 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Schweda Germany 16 272 209 107 100 86 65 659
Lynne Corner United Kingdom 13 78 0.3× 393 1.9× 92 0.9× 168 1.7× 283 3.3× 36 804
Fleur Thomése Netherlands 17 94 0.3× 181 0.9× 92 0.9× 316 3.2× 42 0.5× 30 841
Yani Hamdani Canada 15 118 0.4× 88 0.4× 208 1.9× 125 1.3× 104 1.2× 37 643
Elisabeth O. Burgess United States 16 74 0.3× 258 1.2× 130 1.2× 247 2.5× 118 1.4× 36 747
Catherine V. Talbot United Kingdom 14 73 0.3× 181 0.9× 309 2.9× 208 2.1× 97 1.1× 48 720
Jennifer Fletcher Australia 11 57 0.2× 164 0.8× 54 0.5× 66 0.7× 82 1.0× 15 481
Warren T. Reich United States 11 417 1.5× 480 2.3× 87 0.8× 80 0.8× 74 0.9× 27 823
Charlene Rapsey New Zealand 11 121 0.4× 140 0.7× 335 3.1× 105 1.1× 56 0.7× 38 667
Jan Tøssebro Norway 17 227 0.8× 141 0.7× 267 2.5× 165 1.6× 70 0.8× 47 840
Tula Brannelly United Kingdom 15 97 0.4× 339 1.6× 127 1.2× 214 2.1× 102 1.2× 31 618

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Schweda

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Schweda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Schweda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Schweda more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Schweda

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Schweda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Schweda. The network helps show where Mark Schweda may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Schweda

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Schweda. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Schweda based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Schweda. Mark Schweda is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schweda, Mark, et al.. (2025). The value of privacy for people with dementia. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 15. 1437813–1437813.
2.
Bozzaro, Claudia, et al.. (2025). Intergenerational healthcare ethics: considering conceptualizations of generations and their collective and temporal dimensions. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy. 29(1). 225–241.
4.
Pfaller, Larissa & Mark Schweda. (2024). “Successful Aging”?.
5.
Schweda, Mark, et al.. (2024). Live-in-Versorgung in Deutschland: eine qualitative Inhaltsanalyse gesellschaftlicher und politischer Diskurse. Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen. 192. 57–65.
6.
Kaspar, Roman, Hans‐Jörg Ehni, Mark Schweda, & Hans‐Werner Wahl. (2024). Testing a Context-Enriched Model of Successful Aging in Multiple Large Data Infrastructures With Individuals in Advanced Old Age. The Gerontologist. 65(1). 1 indexed citations
7.
Sturge, Jodi, Sarah Janus, Sytse U. Zuidema, et al.. (2023). The Moral and Gender Implications of Measures Used to Modulate the Mobility of People With Dementia Living in Residential Care Environments: A Scoping Review. The Gerontologist. 64(4). 2 indexed citations
8.
Wiesemann, Claudia & Mark Schweda. (2023). Medizin und die Zeitstruktur guten Lebens. Ethik in der Medizin. 35(1). 1–5. 1 indexed citations
9.
Schicktanz, Silke, et al.. (2023). AI-assisted ethics? considerations of AI simulation for the ethical assessment and design of assistive technologies. Frontiers in Genetics. 14. 1039839–1039839. 11 indexed citations
10.
Schicktanz, Silke & Mark Schweda. (2021). Aging 4.0? Rethinking the ethical framing of technology-assisted eldercare. History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences. 43(3). 93–93. 23 indexed citations
11.
Morais, José A., et al.. (2020). Preventing Dementia?. Berghahn Books. 1 indexed citations
12.
Schweda, Mark, Larissa Pfaller, Kai Brauer, Frank Adloff, & Silke Schicktanz. (2017). Planning Later Life : Bioethics and Public Health in Ageing Societies. Routledge eBooks. 2 indexed citations
13.
Schweda, Mark, Silke Schicktanz, Aviad E. Raz, & Anita Silvers. (2017). Beyond cultural stereotyping: views on end-of-life decision making among religious and secular persons in the USA, Germany, and Israel. BMC Medical Ethics. 18(1). 13–13. 36 indexed citations
14.
Schweda, Mark & Silke Schicktanz. (2014). Why Public Moralities Matter--The Relevance of Socioempirical Premises for the Ethical Debate on Organ Markets. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine. 39(3). 217–222. 2 indexed citations
15.
Schweda, Mark. (2013). Entzweiung und Kompensation : Joachim Ritters philosophische Theorie der modernen Welt. 43(515). 239–42. 3 indexed citations
16.
Schweda, Mark & Georg Marckmann. (2012). HOW DO WE WANT TO GROW OLD? ANTI‐AGEING‐MEDICINE AND THE SCOPE OF PUBLIC HEALTHCARE IN LIBERAL DEMOCRACIES. Bioethics. 27(7). 357–364. 5 indexed citations
17.
Schicktanz, Silke & Mark Schweda. (2011). The Diversity of Responsibility: The Value of Explication and Pluralization. Europe PMC (PubMed Central). 3(3). 131–145. 26 indexed citations
18.
Schweda, Mark & Silke Schicktanz. (2009). The "spare parts person"? Conceptions of the human body and their implications for public attitudes towards organ donation and organ sale. Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine. 4(1). 4–4. 24 indexed citations
19.
Schicktanz, Silke & Mark Schweda. (2009). “One man’s trash is another man’s treasure”: exploring economic and moral subtexts of the “organ shortage” problem in public views on organ donation. Journal of Medical Ethics. 35(8). 473–476. 12 indexed citations
20.
Schweda, Mark, Sabine Wöhlke, & Silke Schicktanz. (2009). Understanding Public Skepticism Toward Organ Donation and Its Commercialization: The Important Role of Reciprocity. Transplantation Proceedings. 41(6). 2509–2511. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026