Jodi Halpern

4.8k citations
73 papers · 2.8k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Jodi Halpern

69 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Jodi Halpern
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Family Practice 199
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.0k
  • Health Informatics 81
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 62
  • General Health Professions 1.0k
Replace Havi Carel with:
Havi Carel United Kingdom
Orit Karnieli‐Miller Israel
Susan H. McDaniel United States
Elizabeth Peel United Kingdom
Jordan Axt United States
Guy Widdershoven Netherlands
Robert H. Aseltine United States
Felicity Callard United Kingdom
Stanley Reiser United States
Damien Ridge United Kingdom
Jodi Halpern relative to Havi Carel United Kingdom Havi Carel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Havi Carel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jodi Halpern

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jodi Halpern's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jodi Halpern with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jodi Halpern more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jodi Halpern

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jodi Halpern. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jodi Halpern. The network helps show where Jodi Halpern may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jodi Halpern, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jodi Halpern Line = papers co-authored together Jodi Halpern links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003457
2 2001288
3 2001249
4 2004169
5 2007150
6 2008121
7 2021114
8 2013110
9 201786
10 202167
11 201462
12 201756
13 202051
14 201149
15 201946
16 201542
17 200739
18 201538
19 202138
20 202038

About Jodi Halpern

Jodi Halpern is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 73 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Empathy and Medical Education (22 papers), Ethics in medical practice (13 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (11 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (7 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (6 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (6 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (6 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (199 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (1.0k citations), Health Informatics (81 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (62 citations) and General Health Professions (1.0k citations). Jodi Halpern has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Harvey M. Weinstein, Robert M. Arnold, Elena Portacolone, Carlos Montemayor, Abrol Fairweather, Julia E. H. Brown, Kenneth E. Covinsky, Julene K. Johnson, Marty Martinson and Eric A. Walle. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Clinical Ethics, PEDIATRICS, The Gerontologist, Journal of General Internal Medicine and The Hastings Center Report.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact