Stephanie M. Noble

625 total citations
8 papers, 449 citations indexed

About

Stephanie M. Noble is a scholar working on Marketing, Sociology and Political Science and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephanie M. Noble has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 449 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Marketing, 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 2 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Stephanie M. Noble's work include Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (4 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (3 papers) and Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (2 papers). Stephanie M. Noble is often cited by papers focused on Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (4 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (3 papers) and Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (2 papers). Stephanie M. Noble collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Mexico. Stephanie M. Noble's co-authors include Joanna Phillips, Diana L. Haytko, Michael Breazeale, Jennifer L. Stevens, Carol L. Jones, Dhruv Grewal, Abhijit Guha, Jens Nordfält, Venkatesh Shankar and Carl-Philip Ahlbom and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Marketing Research and Journal of Business Research.

In The Last Decade

Stephanie M. Noble

8 papers receiving 406 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stephanie M. Noble United States 6 291 233 86 50 48 8 449
D. Israel India 10 295 1.0× 250 1.1× 83 1.0× 67 1.3× 41 0.9× 19 469
Salil Talpade United States 3 271 0.9× 198 0.8× 91 1.1× 51 1.0× 37 0.8× 7 395
Luciana de Araújo Gil Chile 8 366 1.3× 343 1.5× 105 1.2× 51 1.0× 60 1.3× 10 500
Francesco Raggiotto Italy 11 200 0.7× 241 1.0× 78 0.9× 41 0.8× 71 1.5× 24 395
Jane Boyd Thomas United States 11 396 1.4× 209 0.9× 102 1.2× 44 0.9× 41 0.9× 34 545
Tammy R. Kinley United States 11 340 1.2× 216 0.9× 85 1.0× 30 0.6× 33 0.7× 17 482
Carter A. Mandrik Türkiye 7 225 0.8× 159 0.7× 63 0.7× 49 1.0× 39 0.8× 10 380
Heeju Chae South Korea 10 422 1.5× 286 1.2× 121 1.4× 106 2.1× 32 0.7× 25 555
Salomão Alencar de Farias Brazil 10 197 0.7× 215 0.9× 118 1.4× 92 1.8× 34 0.7× 68 452
Deborah J.C. Brosdahl United States 7 243 0.8× 126 0.5× 56 0.7× 45 0.9× 18 0.4× 9 347

Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie M. Noble

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie M. Noble's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie M. Noble with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie M. Noble more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie M. Noble

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie M. Noble. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie M. Noble. The network helps show where Stephanie M. Noble may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephanie M. Noble

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephanie M. Noble. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephanie M. Noble based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephanie M. Noble. Stephanie M. Noble is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Grewal, Dhruv, et al.. (2024). The food production–consumption chain: Fighting food insecurity, loss, and waste with technology. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 52(5). 1412–1430. 10 indexed citations
2.
Grewal, Dhruv, et al.. (2022). The Impact of In-Store Inspirational (vs. Deal-Oriented) Communication on Spending: The Importance of Activating Consumption Goal Completion. Journal of Marketing Research. 60(6). 1071–1094. 7 indexed citations
3.
Lipsyc-Sharf, Marla, Fang‐Shu Ou, Matthew B. Yurgelun, et al.. (2022). Cetuximab and Irinotecan With or Without Bevacizumab in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: BOND-3, an ACCRU Network Randomized Clinical Trial. The Oncologist. 27(4). 292–298. 7 indexed citations
4.
Grewal, Dhruv, et al.. (2020). Mobile Integrated Kiosks: How Communication Content Increases Unplanned Spending. 1 indexed citations
5.
Lipsyc-Sharf, Marla, Fang‐Shu Ou, Matthew B. Yurgelun, et al.. (2020). Irinotecan, cetuximab, and bevacizumab (CBI) versus irinotecan, cetuximab, and placebo (CI) in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Results from an ACCRU network randomized phase II trial.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 38(4_suppl). 102–102. 1 indexed citations
6.
Jones, Carol L., Jennifer L. Stevens, Stephanie M. Noble, & Michael Breazeale. (2019). Panic Attack: How Illegitimate Invasions of Privacy Cause Consumer Anxiety and Dissatisfaction. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing. 39(3). 334–352. 27 indexed citations
7.
Noble, Stephanie M., Diana L. Haytko, & Joanna Phillips. (2008). What drives college-age Generation Y consumers?. Journal of Business Research. 62(6). 617–628. 357 indexed citations
8.
Phillips, Joanna & Stephanie M. Noble. (2007). Simply Captivating: Understanding Consumers' Attitudes Toward the Cinema as an Advertising Medium. Journal of Advertising. 36(1). 81–94. 39 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026