Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Online tools supporting the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and systematic maps: a case study on CADIMA and review of existing tools
2018296 citationsChristian Kohl, Emma McIntosh et al.Environmental Evidenceprofile →
Peers
Steffen Kecke
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
Plant Science227
Food Science103
Biochemistry84
Molecular Biology78
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health33
This map shows the geographic impact of Steffen Kecke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steffen Kecke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steffen Kecke more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steffen Kecke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steffen Kecke. The network helps show where Steffen Kecke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steffen Kecke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steffen Kecke.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steffen Kecke based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Steffen Kecke. Steffen Kecke is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Online tools supporting the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and systematic maps: a case study on CADIMA and review of existing tools breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.