Emma McIntosh
- General Health Professions top 0.5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 1%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 1%
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Co-authors
- Kathleen BoydDavid FrenchLaurence MooreSharon SimpsonLynsay MatthewsPeter CraigMartin WhiteJane Blazeby
- Topics
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (32 papers)Economic and Environmental Valuation (13 papers)Physical Activity and Health (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
Emma McIntosh
145 papers receiving 6.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 185
- General Health Professions 2.0k
- Economics and Econometrics 1.1k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.1k
- Clinical Psychology 828
- Psychiatry and Mental health 705
Countries citing papers authored by Emma McIntosh
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma McIntosh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma McIntosh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma McIntosh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma McIntosh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma McIntosh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma McIntosh. The network helps show where Emma McIntosh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma McIntosh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma McIntosh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma McIntosh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma McIntosh. Emma McIntosh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions: gap analysis, workshop and consultation-informed updatebreakdown → | 266 |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 56 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 33 | |
| 20 | The Personal Social Services Research Unit | 290 |
About Emma McIntosh
Emma McIntosh is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, General Health Professions and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 155 papers that have together received 6.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (32 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (13 papers) and Physical Activity and Health (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (2.0k citations), Applied Psychology (310 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (212 citations). Emma McIntosh has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Kathleen Boyd, David French, Laurence Moore, Sharon Simpson, Lynsay Matthews, Peter Craig, Martin White, Jane Blazeby, Kathryn Skivington and Jo Rycroft‐Malone. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Nature Medicine and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.